From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-artwork/2011-February/000084.html | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 128 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-artwork/2011-February/000084.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-artwork/2011-February/000084.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-artwork/2011-February/000084.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-artwork/2011-February/000084.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2be269404 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-artwork/2011-February/000084.html @@ -0,0 +1,128 @@ + + + + [Mageia-artwork] installer/boot loader artwork + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-artwork] installer/boot loader artwork

+ Romain d'Alverny + rdalverny at gmail.com +
+ Wed Feb 9 15:01:04 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 14:32, Céline Harrand <celine.harrand at gmail.com> wrote:
+> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny at gmail.com> wrote:
+>> The five slides would be:
+>>  - Mageia as a community driven Linux distribution
+>
+> Text taken from the slides at FOSDEM :
+>
+> a Linux distribution, forked from Mandriva Linux/Cooker
+> an international community project, with a meritocratic governance
+> a not-for-profit association
+
+Yep!
+
+>>  - Mageia governance schema (board, council, teams, community; users/makers)
+>
+> I guess we will have to simplify this schema :
+> http://mageia.org/g/images/organisation.png
+
+Yes, simplified a lot. :)
+
+There's a slide ('ll post shortly) in our talks that illustrated the
+flow of the governance (if that can help):
+ - Community (needs, ideas, means, uses)
+ - Teams (reflexion, production)
+ - Council (driving, conflict mgmt)
+ - Board (direction)
+ - Association (structure)
+
+>>  - Mageia values
+> http://mageia.org/en/about/values/
+> Should we only use the titles of this page ? Or is there more powerful
+> ideas in the list items that we should use ?
+
+Tag-clouds? (not very informative, though). Or project goals?
+
+(aside from this, but it is related: from FOSDEM talks, one point that
+was raised was that, although we did list objectives to the project,
+we had no pitch for it; that's something along the mission/vision
+statement, and we have nothing clear enough that embraces all the
+rest).
+
+>>  - Roadmap for 2011
+> The info is here :
+> - http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=docs:fosdem2011&s[]=roadmap#roadmap
+> but how can we illustrate this in such a small space...
+
+There are four steps, we can add a fifth one:
+ - Sept. 2010: project launch & teams setup
+ - Jan 2011: build system ready, packagers rejoice
+ - Feb: first alpha
+ - June: stable release
+ - Summer: brainstorm the future of the project
+
+Or, we can set milestones from now on:
+ - Sept. 2010 - Feb 2011: project launch and now first alpha
+ - June: stable release
+
+> Maybe we can get inspired by the solaris schema :
+> - http://www.technoit.fr/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/solaris-roadmap.gif
+
+Hmmm maybe.
+
+>>  - How to join
+> Should we only list resources on how to contact the project ?
+> - wiki
+> - IRC
+> - mailing-list
+
+Actually I would have just listed several means to join/help: being a
+packagers, tester, joining another team, with a single URL, like
+mageia.org/join where would most of the contents be.
+
+Romain
+
+ + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-artwork +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1