[Mageia-artwork] [Mageia-Artwork}

Thu Apr 21 10:49:08 CEST 2011

On 21 April 2011 09:15, Romain d'Alverny <rdalverny at gmail.com> wrote:
+> Hi Donald,
+>
+> thanks for the update!
+>
+> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 13:10, Donald Stewart <watersnowrock at gmail.com> wrote:
+>> Kspalsh; is done and sorted
+>> Gsplash; appears to not exist and upstream have deleted it. So a
+>> decision on that is still needed.
+>
+> >From here and/or packagers?
+>
+>> KDM; requires a fix on the default backgrounds
+>> GDM; not sure about it, check later
+>>
+>> Backgrounds; there are a number of wrongs symlinks and a few other
+>> parts could be cleaned out. Also an update on backgrounds-extra? A
+>> decision for final on whither or not we go with static or dynamic
+>> backgrounds should be made. As the current dynamic setup adds load on
+>> the system for nothing as all the images are the same with no
+>> progression.
+>
+> But is the load noticeable (happens hourly at most, right?).
+>
+>> Sadly I cant attend the next meeting, so it would be great if you
+>> could discuss the static/dynamic issue, if we choose dynamic I have
+>> the new images ready to upload.
+>
+> So go for it.
+>
+> Romain
+> _______________________________________________
+> Mageia-artwork mailing list
+> Mageia-artwork at mageia.org
+> https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-artwork
+>
+
+Upstream have removed it, so we need to decide if we are ok with not
+having gsplash, can any gnome users comment on this?
+
+I'm not sure of the time changes, but I have heard that it can add
+~10% to constant cpu load which suggests that the images are
+constantly transitioned.
+
+Donald
+