diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment-0001.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment-0001.html | 52 |
1 files changed, 52 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..03b3b4ed3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM, andré <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:andr55@laposte.net">andr55@laposte.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +Sander Lepik a écrit :<div class="im"><br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> + 02.10.2010 18:22, Remco Rijnders kirjutas:<br> + <br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 03:13:27PM +0000, André Machado wrote:<br> +<br> +* Mageia 2011.0 ?<br> +* Mageia 2001.1 ?<br> +* Mageia 11.01 ? :D<br> +* Mageia 1.0 ?<br> + <br> +</blockquote> +20xx.0 -> 20xx.1 is perfect. Tho' 20xx.0 should be released at spring time and 20xx.1 later<br> +the same year. At the moment it doesn't make sense and many friends have asked why is 20xy<br> +released in 20x(y-1).<br> + <br> +</blockquote></div> +Exactly. Mandriva version numbering sounds like we are selling cars. (You know, all image and no substance.)<br> +So let's go for Mageia 2010.1 if we can do it this fall. (Hopefully)<br> +And Mageia 2011.0 in the spring.<br> +Note that we will have to recompile to change Mandriva to Mageia, so changing the version number should cause no problem.<div class="im"><br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> + +How about instead of using 0 or 1, use the month number instead? So, .3<br> +for a release made in March. That way we are always "up to date" and can<br> +allow for release schedules slipping or having a 3rd release within a year<br> +if needed / fitting.<br> + <br> +</blockquote> +Such versioning is bad. It forces you into time limit like it is with Ubuntu. And i don't<br> +like it. When the release needs to be delayed it's better to do so. Not to push it out and<br> +then land loads of fixes on it like has happened to Ubuntu. Also you don't have to remember<br> +which month it was released in year 2008. Was it 2008.3 or 2008.5?<br> + <br> +</blockquote></div> +It is a lot simpler to use 0 or 1.<br> +If the month is used, and there is a delay for some reason, would you want to have to change the names of 100's of files ?<br> +Including the dependancies in the RPM's ?<br> +Otherwise, the month would have no more meaning than 0 or 1.<br> +<br> +And why would you want 3 releases in a year ? With the pace of changes in Linux, 2 seems just right. If there are any important updates, for security, for instance, that is already built into the Mandriva system we are inheriting (like virtually all others).<br> + +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +--<br> +Sander<br> + <br> +</blockquote> +- André (andre999)<br> +<br> +</blockquote></div>Why not make them read the version info from one place? (on a long term...)<br> |