diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101006/002242.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101006/002242.html | 93 |
1 files changed, 93 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101006/002242.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101006/002242.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..243368a45 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101006/002242.html @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia%20governance%20model%20draft&In-Reply-To=%3C201010060858.22360.oliver.bgr%40googlemail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002232.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002243.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft</H1> + <B>Oliver Burger</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia%20governance%20model%20draft&In-Reply-To=%3C201010060858.22360.oliver.bgr%40googlemail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft">oliver.bgr at googlemail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Wed Oct 6 08:58:22 CEST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002232.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002243.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2242">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2242">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2242">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2242">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>"Romain d'Alverny" <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">rdalverny at gmail.com</A>> schrieb am 2010-10-06 +><i> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 20:42, Oliver Burger <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">oliver.bgr at googlemail.com</A>> +</I>wrote: +><i> > In technical things I support two or more levels. There's much to learn +</I>><i> > for little community packagers as myself as there is in any field for +</I>><i> > the newcommers. +</I>><i> But in last resort, not only involved, but committed people get a +</I>><i> decisive voice. In teams, those committed people are those who were +</I>><i> recognized as such by their peers, through the mentoring process. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Which process is not an exclusive one (keep "bad" newcomers out), but +</I>><i> an inclusive one (welcome and train them before they get full hands on +</I>><i> the infrastructure). And that, again, wouldn't prevent non-'masters' +</I>><i> and 'non-apprentices' to provide/contribute something to the project, +</I>><i> only should it be reviewed and committed to the project by those team +</I>><i> members. +</I>As said before. There is no problem with having "masters" and "padawans" (I +would prefer that term to apprentice :D ) when it comestotechnical decisions. +I hope that all (orat least most) people involvedin mageia will let the people +with the technical knowledge do the technical decisions (althoug some +discussions on the mls do read different). +I do understand and support the need for reviewing the work ofnew packagers, +correcting it and teaching those new packagers how to build better packages +but that is - as I said - a technical decision, in which nothing at all can be +said against a master-padawan-thing. Even if those new packagers have +builtrpms for years (because I have seen quite some rpms fromlocal communities +whose spec files made me shudder). +But I do believe, when it comes to policy decisions (like electing board +members and so on) there should not be those who have a vote and those +whodoesn't. Certainly there must be some kind of differentiation between active +community members and passers-by who just want to "troll vote". But as you +described it initially, a majority of the active community members (like those +poor folks who did community work for years now in their local communities) +would be excluded from deciding the directionthe community as a whole does +take. + +Oliver +</PRE> + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002232.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002243.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2242">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2242">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2242">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2242">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |