summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011197.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011197.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011197.html264
1 files changed, 264 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011197.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011197.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c8444f445
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011197.html
@@ -0,0 +1,264 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [RFC] Moving various packages/codecs to tainted
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20Moving%20various%20packages/codecs%20to%20tainted&In-Reply-To=%3C4F0BBD07.4070908%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="011195.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="011203.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Moving various packages/codecs to tainted</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20Moving%20various%20packages/codecs%20to%20tainted&In-Reply-To=%3C4F0BBD07.4070908%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Moving various packages/codecs to tainted">andre999mga at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Jan 10 05:22:31 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011195.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Moving various packages/codecs to tainted
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011203.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Moving various packages/codecs to tainted
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11197">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11197">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11197">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11197">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Anssi Hannula a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> On 10.01.2012 04:08, David Walser wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Anssi Hannula wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> On 10.01.2012 01:30, David Walser wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Anssi Hannula wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Hi all!
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> As I've noted in some previous emails, our core/tainted media codec
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> split-up is currently arbitrary without any specific logic.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> As far as I remember, the tainted policy is that codecs for formats that
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> are claimed to be covered by patents should be there.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Per that policy, at least the AC-3/DTS/MP3/MPEG-2/MPEG-4/H.264/VC-1
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> decoders and AC-3/MPEG-2/MPEG-4 encoders we have in core should be moved
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> to tainted section. Note that this will make most current
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> .mkv/.avi/.mp4/.mov/.wmv/.mp3 files unplayable without packages from
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> tainted section.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> That's the absolute last thing I want to see happen. It's one of the reasons Fedora and others that do that are not viable options for a
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> lot
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> of non-technical users, and it just makes it so you have to jump through a lot of extra hoops just to have a reasonably working system
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> (whether it's your own or for family members that you might be maintaining). Obvouisly just about every codec in use has patents relevant
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> to
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> it, but I think we're OK to stick with the ones Mandriva shipped for years in core (like mp3 decoding) and things that were in PLF in
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> tainted
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> (like mp3 encoding) even if it seems arbitrary. If anything, it'd be nice if more not-likely-to-be-problematic codecs could be moved to
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> core.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I'm absolutely fine with either moving codecs to core or tainted, as
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> long as we are at least somewhat consistent in what is in core and what
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> is in tainted. However, I do not really like the reasoning &quot;we do it
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> like mandriva did no matter if it is sensible or not&quot;.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I'd possibly understand &quot;we do it like mandriva did because they didn't
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> apparently have problems with these pkgs&quot;, but it IMHO wouldn't really
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> fly as we could just s/mandriva/ubuntu/ in that statement (and Ubuntu is
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> much more prominent than mdv IMO) and then everything would be in core...
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Sure, I but I think Mandriva achieved a good balance between respecting patents and not being overly paranoid.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The problem is that that &quot;balance&quot; was achieved by sticking packages in
+</I>&gt;<i> PLF/main/contrib semi-randomly. For example, H.264 decoders and MPEG-4
+</I>&gt;<i> video encoders are in main/core, while e.g. AAC audio decoders are in
+</I>&gt;<i> PLF/tainted. If one'd put them into an order, IMO H.264 and MPEG-4 would
+</I>&gt;<i> be much more prominent and tainted candidates instead of AAC decoding...
+</I>&gt;<i> Also, in e.g. MPEG-4 case we have encoders both in core and in tainted,
+</I>&gt;<i> e.g. we have ffmpeg in core, but xvid in tainted.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I suppose you can't blame a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> US company like RedHat for being overly paranoid, but as you said, Mandriva hasn't had any problems. Are there any there examples out of
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> there of distros trying to achieve this balance? Obviously we don't want to follow Ubuntu or ROSA in pretending patents don't exist.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Linux Mint provides a &quot;No codecs&quot; CD:
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://www.linuxmint.com/download.php">http://www.linuxmint.com/download.php</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Ubuntu has a patent policy (which basically IIRC says &quot;rights owner or
+</I>&gt;<i> packager, please contact us if you think there is an infringement, we
+</I>&gt;<i> will investgate&quot;):
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatentPolicy">https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PatentPolicy</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+This is the type of patent policy we should have.
+It requires the registered patent holder to inform Ubuntu of the patent
+claims and the specific package(s) involved before a patent claim is
+considered by Ubuntu.
+With this policy, probably most of the packages now in &quot;tainted&quot; could
+be transfered to core.
+
+&gt;<i> Note also that the Ubuntu Live CD and therefore the default Ubuntu
+</I>&gt;<i> installation do not contain any codecs. By default Totem is installed,
+</I>&gt;<i> however, and gstreamer is plugged into &quot;gnome-codec-install&quot; (which
+</I>&gt;<i> seems really nice, do we use it?), so that wen you try to play an
+</I>&gt;<i> unsupported video the first time, it will prompt to install the codecs
+</I>&gt;<i> (it will also show a warning dialog about patents etc, but AFAICS this
+</I>&gt;<i> comes from gnome-codec-install itself, not Ubuntu).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+That sounds nice. The package that automatically found codecs in
+Mandriva would give a lot of false positives, and would always go to a
+paid site. I removed the package, and most (but not all) of the media
+concerned worked without additional codecs.
+
+&gt;<i> If the user installs a video player depending on ffmpeg, e.g. VLC via
+</I>&gt;<i> the software center, the codecs in ffmpeg will be pulled &quot;normally&quot;,
+</I>&gt;<i> i.e. silently.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Linux Mint had also gstreamer plugged to gnome-codec-install, so the
+</I>&gt;<i> codecs will be installed if the user tries to play such a video with
+</I>&gt;<i> totem (again with warnings).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+We should look into doing something along these lines.
+It would be advantageous however to have codec packages, for
+installation before hand, as many users won't necessarily always an
+Internet connexion available.
+
+--
+Andr&#233;
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011195.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Moving various packages/codecs to tainted
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011203.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] Moving various packages/codecs to tainted
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11197">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11197">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11197">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11197">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>