diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/018309.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/018309.html | 103 |
1 files changed, 103 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/018309.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/018309.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b6d42c8e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/018309.html @@ -0,0 +1,103 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20removal%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C503A33B2.5050402%40eesti.ee%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="018308.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="018312.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal</H1> + <B>Sander Lepik</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Package%20removal%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C503A33B2.5050402%40eesti.ee%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal">sander.lepik at eesti.ee + </A><BR> + <I>Sun Aug 26 16:33:22 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018308.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="018312.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#18309">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#18309">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#18309">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#18309">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE> +Sander + +26.08.2012 17:15, Colin Guthrie kirjutas: +><i> 'Twas brillig, and Johnny A. Solbu at 25/08/12 02:42 did gyre and gimble: +</I>>><i> On Saturday 25 August 2012 02:33, Olivier Thauvin wrote: +</I>>>><i> For me obsolete should be reserved for replacements or rename, nothing +</I>>>><i> more. +</I>>><i> I agree on this. +</I>><i> So in two years time, we add a new package with the same filename as one +</I>><i> of these old package, we may get some very strange edge cases on package +</I>><i> upgrades/installer because keeping these old, no longer shipped packages +</I>><i> installed is still "supported" (of course this could happen even if the +</I>><i> old package were obsoleted properly, due to package install order on +</I>><i> upgrades) +</I>><i> +</I>><i> What about when there are security issues in the old package? Do we just +</I>><i> drop it and then wash our hands of the whole affair and don't give a +</I>><i> crap when a user's system is completely compromised? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> In my opinion we should run a tight ship. If users want to use something +</I>><i> we no longer ship, then they still have several choices: +</I>><i> 1. Don't install task-obsolete and add it to their skip.list. +</I>><i> 2. Do a local compile+install into /usr/local of the software in question +</I>><i> 3. Package it and become a contributor (assuming the reason for +</I>><i> dropping the package was due to a lack of maintainer rather than a +</I>><i> specific desire/reason (i.e. legal)) +</I>><i> +</I>><i> For all of these options the user is both informed and can make a very +</I>><i> clear, concious choice about how they want to proceed and know the +</I>><i> consequences of doing so. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Obsoletes in packages which genuinely replace the old one seem +</I>><i> reasonable and uncontroversial. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Col +</I>><i> +</I>What about new feature. Some txt file (containing obsoleted package per line and probably +can be signed somehow) in the mirrors that can be updated by sysadmins. During update urpmi +will check this file and will compare with local file where user has marked what (s)he wants +to do with those packages (<obsoleted package> <status: keep/remove> per line). If urpmi +finds package that hasn't been listed in local file it will ask the user what to do with it ++ will show warning that all possible security problems are not our problem anymore. +</PRE> + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="018308.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="018312.html">[Mageia-dev] Package removal proposal +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#18309">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#18309">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#18309">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#18309">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |