diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/015013.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/015013.html | 92 |
1 files changed, 92 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/015013.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/015013.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e13a9cf47 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-April/015013.html @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Xfce%204.10%20released&In-Reply-To=%3C4F9D179F.1070907%40gmail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="015011.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="015014.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released</H1> + <B>Jani Välimaa</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Xfce%204.10%20released&In-Reply-To=%3C4F9D179F.1070907%40gmail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released">jani.valimaa at gmail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Sun Apr 29 12:27:43 CEST 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015011.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="015014.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#15013">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#15013">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#15013">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#15013">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On 29.04.2012 12:55, zezinho wrote: +><i> Em 29-04-2012 09:43, Jani Välimaa escreveu: +</I>>><i> I know it's not the right time for this, but I'm wondering if we could +</I>>><i> push new Xfce 4.10 also to updates for upcoming mga2? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Only when backports media is available : there is no reason to change +</I>><i> our policy for updates. +</I> +We don't need to change our policy, only turn a blind eye to it. And as +we don't have backport repos yet and haven't seen any progress making +them available, updates are the only choice. Also, it was done for KDE +update in mga1. So, why not for another DE? + +Currently we have a mixture of unstable (4.10 pre) and stable (4.8) Xfce +pkgs in our repos. IMHO it would be good to have stable versions +available to provide as good user experience for Xfce users as possible. +I've heard that some users switched to another distro because our Xfce +is outdated in mga1. I don't want to see this happening again. + +P.S. I'm fine to push new Xfce to backports, but we really need to do +something to make backports available after mga2 release. +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="015011.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="015014.html">[Mageia-dev] Xfce 4.10 released +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#15013">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#15013">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#15013">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#15013">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |