summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003348.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003348.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003348.html102
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003348.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003348.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..de78997d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110315/003348.html
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Repository%20question%3A%20where%20do%20we%0A%20put%09non-free%2Btainted%20RPMs%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4D7FEF08.8010407%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003344.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="003300.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Repository%20question%3A%20where%20do%20we%0A%20put%09non-free%2Btainted%20RPMs%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4D7FEF08.8010407%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Mar 15 23:58:16 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003344.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003300.html">[Mageia-dev] Alpha-1 Comments
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3348">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3348">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3348">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3348">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Tux99 a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I was looking at Mandriva non-free SRPM directory since Mageia doesn't have
+</I>&gt;<i> much in non-free yet.
+</I>&gt;<i> I haven't actually counted if the majority has source or not, so you might
+</I>&gt;<i> be right, but we are digressing here because like I said in the first post
+</I>&gt;<i> the question here in this thread is about a package that has code with a
+</I>&gt;<i> non-free license but is open source (and is 'tainted').
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> To quote my initial mail:
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;... what the appropriate repository for a package is that's both non-free
+</I>&gt;<i> (open source but not a FOSS license) and tainted (contains sw. that is
+</I>&gt;<i> covered by patents in some parts of the world).&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> To complicate matters further this package will have dependencies to some
+</I>&gt;<i> other 'tainted' packages, which also a reason why 'tainted' seems more
+</I>&gt;<i> appropiate for this specifica package at least.
+</I>
+What do you mean by &quot;open source but not a FOSS license&quot; ?
+Normally &quot;open source&quot; means that it is licensed to be freely
+redistributed (without royalties), with available source code.
+Public domain software with available source code, although not having a
+FOSS license, is also considered free.
+
+As for the point about potential patent claims, in the U.S. (the usual
+example), I don't know of any example of a mirror of an open source
+distro that has had problems with software patent claims.
+In the U.S., software patent claims are made against those who make
+money from the software, and few such cases succeed. No money is to be
+made by pursuing those who give away software for free.
+Ubuntu, for example, has many mirrors in the U.S. carrying potentially
+patent-threatened software, without problems.
+
+I would suggest that if the software in question is _really_ open
+source, put it in &quot;core&quot;. If not, put it in &quot;non-free&quot;.
+If eventually it becomes _directly_ threatened by software patent
+claims, _then_ consider transfering it to another repository.
+
+(Besides the practical question of only responding to a potential threat
+when really needed, if you don't consider software patents legitimate,
+there is nothing inherently wrong with the software anyway. As long as
+it works.
+So why call it &quot;tainted&quot;.)
+
+my 2 cents :)
+--
+Andr&#233;
+</PRE>
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003344.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003300.html">[Mageia-dev] Alpha-1 Comments
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3348">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3348">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3348">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3348">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>