diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html | 108 |
1 files changed, 108 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..16a64334c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Opening%20backports%20%28was%20Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Using%0A%09SQL%20database%20for%20youri%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201110010114.15337.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008561.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="008572.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)</H1> + <B>Samuel Verschelde</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Opening%20backports%20%28was%20Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Using%0A%09SQL%20database%20for%20youri%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201110010114.15337.stormi%40laposte.net%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)">stormi at laposte.net + </A><BR> + <I>Sat Oct 1 01:14:15 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008561.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008572.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8563">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8563">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8563">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8563">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Le samedi 1 octobre 2011 00:57:35, blind Pete a écrit : +><i> on Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:05 +</I>><i> in the Usenet newsgroup gmane.linux.mageia.devel +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Maarten Vanraes wrote: +</I>><i> > Op vrijdag 30 september 2011 23:35:40 schreef Samuel Verschelde: +</I>><i> >> Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 21:10:42, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : +</I>><i> [snip] +</I>><i> +</I>><i> >> > Also, the sooner we have backports, the less there will be external +</I>><i> >> > third- party repos with all the problems (upgrade, support) that +</I>><i> >> > causes. There already are, don't let them too much space and rather +</I>><i> >> > invite their packagers to backport *inside* (as long as they stay +</I>><i> >> > within the policy of course). +</I>><i> +</I>><i> [snip] +</I>><i> +</I>><i> >> If needed, the tremendous amount of packages in Blogdrake's 3rd party +</I>><i> >> media shows how much backports are needed by users, whatever we as +</I>><i> >> packagers can think of it. +</I>><i> >> +</I>><i> >> I'm still convinced that opening backports right now, using one of my 2 +</I>><i> >> proposals (if I haven't overlooked a technical difficulty), would be an +</I>><i> >> important step forward for us. +</I>><i> >> +</I>><i> >> Best regards +</I>><i> >> +</I>><i> >> Samuel +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > I have to agree, if opening backports brings in more packagers who are +</I>><i> > likely to integrate well AND bring in more users AND likely would step +</I>><i> > up and maintain similar packages, we should help their effort and not +</I>><i> > get our community too splintered, even though updates _is_ more +</I>><i> > important than backports. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Potentially silly idea: +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Would it be worth having backports-supported and backports-unsupported, +</I>><i> or backports and backports-untested, or backports and backports-3rd-party? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> You could occasionally move things in either direction between +</I>><i> supported and unsupported. +</I> +You already have them: backports and backports_testing. backports is +supported, backports_testing isn't (equivalent to your backports-untested). +However, packages sent to backports_testing must respect the backports policy, +which is a difference with 3rd party media where we don't know what policy is +applied. + +Best regards + +Samuel Verschelde +</PRE> + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008561.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008572.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8563">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8563">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8563">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8563">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |