summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006042.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006042.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006042.html158
1 files changed, 158 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006042.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006042.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b3e91ea61
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/006042.html
@@ -0,0 +1,158 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Update%20of%20backport%2C%20policy%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C1309097123.22020.328.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006041.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="006043.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Update%20of%20backport%2C%20policy%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C1309097123.22020.328.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Jun 26 16:05:21 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006041.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006043.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6042">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6042">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6042">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6042">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 &#224; 14:49 +0200, Wolfgang Bornath a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> 2011/6/26 Michael Scherer &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt;:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 &#224; 11:58 +0300, atilla ontas a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; 2011/6/26 Wolfgang Bornath &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">molch.b at googlemail.com</A>&gt;:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; A short reality check from userside:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; If foo-1.0 is in Mageia 1 and foo-1.1 is released upstream
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; - foo-1.1 will likely be integrated in Cauldron very soon after
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; - users will request to have foo-1.1 in Mageia 1
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; - if Mageia will not provide it then there will soon be local
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; repositories where local packagers will do a &quot;backport&quot; for their
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; friends.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; This may not be what Mageia backport policy will allow but we can not
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; avoid people doing and using this, no matter how many warning signs we
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; will publish. This has to be taken into account here.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; When a policy is found it has to be communicated very well, especially
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; if that policy means that the user can not have foo-1.1 in his stable
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; Mageia 1.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; This is important because former Mandriva users were used to get
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; almost all new versions backported, if not officially then in 3rd
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; party repos like MIB or MUD.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; --
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; wobo
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; As wobo mentioned, people like latest and greatest software. I think,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; except a few users will use unofficial 3rd party repos to get latest
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; software. While i was maintaining MVT (Mandriva Turkiye) repository,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; our users asked for GNOME 2.32 while Mandriva have GNOME 2.30 on
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; official release.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; And others people mentioned that people want also stable software and do
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; not want changes. But as I said, what people want is not as important
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; than what we can do, and so the decision is in the end of those that do
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; the work rather than what people want, because if no one does the work,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; nothing happen.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Well, in principle this is correct, not in this case as I have
+</I>&gt;<i> explained as a very common example. You can decide whatever you want,
+</I>&gt;<i> if a user wants a certain package and his friend will pack it for him
+</I>&gt;<i> and puts it up on a server, publishing the existence - then you will
+</I>&gt;<i> see what happens. You know by experience how popular such 3rd-party
+</I>&gt;<i> repos can become (see MIB, MUD), just because somebody had a different
+</I>&gt;<i> view than the official view.
+</I>
+Then someone did it the job. Maybe not correctly from a technical point
+of view, with all the problem this can create ( lack of audit and
+reproductability, as I seen while trying to understand MIB stuff, non
+integration with the rest of the distribution, since this requires to
+type command line etc, breakage of stuff like upgrade of version ), but
+still did the work.
+
+Of course, most of the time, that's not sustainable, but who really care
+about that...
+
+&gt;<i> In short: no matter what is more important or not, you have to find a
+</I>&gt;<i> compromise between the (understandable) search for optimal workflow,
+</I>&gt;<i> security on one side and the real world of the users on the other.
+</I>
+Can people please stop saying that &quot;users&quot; are living in the real world,
+as this logically imply that others ( ie, &quot;us&quot;, for whatever that mean )
+are not ?
+
+Optimal workflow is solving a real problem for ressources, with impact
+on the distribution. Security is a real problem too. That's not because
+some people do not see a problem that it doesn't existe or that it is a
+fake one.
+
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006041.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006043.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6042">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6042">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6042">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6042">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>