summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010419.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010419.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010419.html131
1 files changed, 131 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010419.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010419.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d70e02ab1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010419.html
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How broken are RPM dependencies allowed to be?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20broken%20are%20RPM%20dependencies%20allowed%20to%20be%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCAONrEtY3hm4%2BBwM17b%3DdK0vb9AO9RbqV0rrSH%3DZ88OUv4jq_7Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="010440.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="010430.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] How broken are RPM dependencies allowed to be?</H1>
+ <B>Thierry Vignaud</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20broken%20are%20RPM%20dependencies%20allowed%20to%20be%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CCAONrEtY3hm4%2BBwM17b%3DdK0vb9AO9RbqV0rrSH%3DZ88OUv4jq_7Q%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How broken are RPM dependencies allowed to be?">thierry.vignaud at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Dec 14 12:31:36 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010440.html">[Mageia-dev] How broken are RPM dependencies allowed to be?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010430.html">[Mageia-dev] How broken are RPM dependencies allowed to be?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#10419">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#10419">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#10419">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#10419">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On 14 December 2011 10:14, Dan Fandrich &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">dan at coneharvesters.com</A>&gt; wrote:
+&gt;<i> I can understand that my particular case is unsupported, but I described
+</I>&gt;<i> a different, supported, scenario that would also fail due to this problem.
+</I>&gt;<i> To reiterate, a distribution upgrade from 1 to 2 (once it's finalized)
+</I>&gt;<i> could involve urpmi first upgrading the perl-dependent package but avoid
+</I>&gt;<i> installing the new perl itself until the end of the upgrade, which could be
+</I>&gt;<i> hours or (if interrupted) days later.
+</I>
+This is bullshit.
+urpmi will upgrade perl itself first (with glibc, rpm &amp; perl-URPM).
+
+&gt;<i> During the entirety of that time,
+</I>&gt;<i> that package would be unusable. If that package happened to be a key CGI
+</I>&gt;<i> script for a web site, the entire site would be down for that entire time.
+</I>
+This is totally unrealistic.
+If someone is fool enough to perform a live upgrade on a server
+still serving requests, it deserves being shoot. Twice.
+One usually pulls a server out of trafic, upgrade it, then put it back
+in use. And keeps HA by keeping another old server responding.
+That's not a valid use case.
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> Installing packages individually from one release on another release is not
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> supported. Either upgrade the entire distro first, or stick to packages from
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> the version you are on. However 'upgrade from release to Cauldron', when done
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> correctly, should usually work as expected.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Yes, &quot;usually&quot;. Is Mageia the operating system that works reliably 95% of the
+</I>&gt;<i> time?
+</I>
+This will break on every distro.
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> But, in supported use cases, urpmi *does* ensure that all the pieces to keep
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> urpmi are upgraded in one transaction.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> But only if the dependencies are set correctly. And my original bug report on
+</I>&gt;<i> that has just now been closed as WONTFIX.
+</I>
+Once again, your report has nothing to do with urpmi.
+Urpmi doesn't depends on quite a lot of packages and
+it WILL upgrade them first then restart.
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010440.html">[Mageia-dev] How broken are RPM dependencies allowed to be?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010430.html">[Mageia-dev] How broken are RPM dependencies allowed to be?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#10419">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#10419">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#10419">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#10419">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>