summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001172.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001172.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001172.html125
1 files changed, 125 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001172.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001172.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d98a088ef
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101014/001172.html
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201010141427.04267.bgmilne%40multilinks.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001202.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001173.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?</H1>
+ <B>Buchan Milne</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20How%20will%20be%20the%20realese%20cycle%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201010141427.04267.bgmilne%40multilinks.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?">bgmilne at multilinks.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Oct 14 15:27:03 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001202.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001173.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1172">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1172">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1172">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1172">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Thursday, 14 October 2010 04:59:52 Fernando Parra wrote:
+&gt;<i> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 08:20:40 -0400
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Sinner from the Prairy &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">sinnerbofh-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w at public.gmane.org</A>&gt;
+</I>wrote:
+&gt;<i> &gt; Fernando Parra wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; (Finally, it would not be as strict versions of certain components. If,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; for example morning out mageia 2010 (for instance) and the day after
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Firefox 4.0 comes out, you do not run the 3.6.x version with all the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; time,)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; That's very clear, these users are trying to say: &quot;We want a different
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; model, but we want a stable distro&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; As we have been saying over and over again, this only indicates zero
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; knowledge of backports repositories.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; We should publicize more Backports.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> And I shall reply over and over again, backports isn't a solution, maybe
+</I>&gt;<i> it's a technical solution, but it isn't The Solution.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+What aspects of the Mandriva backports solution are not satisfactory?
+
+-The fact that not everything is available as a backport?
+-That users don't know how to request a backport?
+-That too many backports are available?
+-That all users don't get them by default?
+-That users doing network installs by default don't get the backport on
+initial installation?
+-That users aren't aware of backports?
+-Something else?
+
+Please provide some *CONSTRUCTIVE* criticism, or the people who have been
+doing the effort of *PROVIDING* the backports, as well as using them, will
+probably just write you off as not knowing what is available.
+
+IMHO, backports is relatively successful. No one who has criticised backports
+has provided a valid reason, that takes into account what it *does* provide,
+indicating where it fails.
+
+&gt;<i> The end users need to do less than now for to get new versions of their
+</I>&gt;<i> favourites applications.
+</I>
+Less than 'urpmi --searchmedia Backports chromium' ?
+
+Or, should it be more obvious in rpmdrake or similar? How about commenting on
+my proposal for UI change in rpmdrake making backports more obvious?
+
+&gt;<i> Mageia needs to offer more than other distros, much more, in a different
+</I>&gt;<i> way. If we aren't to be able to make a completely new concept, we are in a
+</I>&gt;<i> serious risk to become in other distro at that sea called GNU / Linux.
+</I>
+Again, before we can decide what *more* we should do (what significant
+resources we need to commit), maybe we should first understand why the
+existing features (which have significant effort behind them) are not
+resulting in user satisfaction.
+
+Regards,
+Buchan
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001202.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001173.html">[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1172">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1172">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1172">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1172">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>