summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/t
Commit message (Expand)AuthorAgeFilesLines
* test "urpmq --list"Pascal Rigaux2008-01-151-0/+6
* - 5.0Pascal Rigaux2008-01-111-1/+1
* add a test case for #27417 (no fix yet)Pascal Rigaux2007-12-202-0/+56
* - all tools:Pascal Rigaux2007-12-192-32/+30
* also check the pkg correctly builds with filesPascal Rigaux2007-12-183-4/+10
* add tests for %ghost conflicts (which should be allowed)Pascal Rigaux2007-12-183-0/+77
* add some tests for %buildroot, %defaultbuildroot, BuildRootPascal Rigaux2007-12-173-0/+99
* - check "old suggests" are still handled.Pascal Rigaux2007-12-143-0/+8
* get rid of a "Use of uninitialized value"Pascal Rigaux2007-12-111-2/+2
* - urpmi:Pascal Rigaux2007-12-101-0/+11
* - urpmi:Pascal Rigaux2007-11-303-6/+21
* adapt to "--split-length 8" being the defaultPascal Rigaux2007-11-281-1/+1
* add a test for "urpmq --fuzzy"Pascal Rigaux2007-11-281-0/+12
* test "urpmi --src" and "urpmi --install-src"Pascal Rigaux2007-11-151-2/+26
* allow to run tests on 4.4.2.2 which gives a few different resultsPascal Rigaux2007-11-145-15/+41
* run complex test laterPascal Rigaux2007-10-191-1/+1
* remove debug codePascal Rigaux2007-10-191-1/+0
* use system_() from helper.pmPascal Rigaux2007-10-161-7/+2
* fixed in rpm-4.4.8-22mdv2008 :)Pascal Rigaux2007-10-021-1/+1
* add a test showing rpm failure (for #34342)Pascal Rigaux2007-10-022-0/+35
* better docPascal Rigaux2007-10-021-0/+2
* add docPascal Rigaux2007-10-021-0/+9
* add a test which currently triggers a big transactionPascal Rigaux2007-09-286-0/+110
* with perl-URPM 2.04, promote on obsoletes are properly handledPascal Rigaux2007-09-271-2/+2
* - move some test from superuser--media_info_dir.t into superuser--rpm.tPascal Rigaux2007-09-273-9/+56
* add a rebuilddb check (to detect bugs like #34181)Pascal Rigaux2007-09-271-0/+10
* KBackup failing is not a big dealPascal Rigaux2007-09-211-1/+1
* add an old .src.rpm in the test. it failsPascal Rigaux2007-09-212-0/+12
* be more precise (useful for next commit)Pascal Rigaux2007-09-211-1/+1
* add a test casePascal Rigaux2007-09-131-1/+38
* those tests do pass nicely with perl-URPM 2.00Pascal Rigaux2007-09-132-5/+7
* cleanupPascal Rigaux2007-09-131-24/+18
* add a test case (to detect breakage in perl-URPM)Pascal Rigaux2007-09-121-6/+14
* explainPascal Rigaux2007-09-121-1/+4
* promote fixed in perl-URPM > 1.80Pascal Rigaux2007-09-121-2/+2
* silence gendistribPascal Rigaux2007-09-101-1/+1
* add a reverse conflict test case, not nicely handled at the momentPascal Rigaux2007-09-075-0/+68
* mark clearly what are errors (ERROR) and what could be better (WARNING)Pascal Rigaux2007-09-074-10/+10
* add another testPascal Rigaux2007-09-071-0/+13
* add more tests showing the need for promotionPascal Rigaux2007-09-075-1/+87
* add a test showing the lack of promotionPascal Rigaux2007-09-071-0/+14
* add a simple test case for promotion on conflictPascal Rigaux2007-09-075-9/+82
* nicer commentPascal Rigaux2007-09-071-2/+2
* rename test into split-transactions--promotePascal Rigaux2007-09-0710-0/+0
* add a test showing promotion of a new package on missing requirePascal Rigaux2007-09-076-5/+91
* add a simple test that shows urpmi promotes pkgs when a strict require failsPascal Rigaux2007-09-0512-18/+104
* add a test (that is not fully well handled)Pascal Rigaux2007-09-051-0/+6
* add a commentPascal Rigaux2007-09-051-1/+1
* test case is fixed since perl-URPM defaults to "one big transaction" insteadPascal Rigaux2007-09-051-2/+1
* add a test case which triggers "transaction is too small" errorPascal Rigaux2007-09-056-0/+100