Commit message (Expand) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | it's not an ERROR, urpmi really must do +a-2,+c-2,-b-1 in the same transaction | Pascal Rigaux | 2008-01-18 | 1 | -1/+1 |
* | add a failing test case | Pascal Rigaux | 2008-01-18 | 1 | -0/+19 |
* | add a test which currently triggers a big transaction | Pascal Rigaux | 2007-09-28 | 1 | -0/+42 |
* | rename test into split-transactions--promote | Pascal Rigaux | 2007-09-07 | 1 | -50/+0 |
* | add a test showing promotion of a new package on missing require | Pascal Rigaux | 2007-09-07 | 1 | -5/+23 |
* | add a simple test that shows urpmi promotes pkgs when a strict require fails | Pascal Rigaux | 2007-09-05 | 1 | -13/+12 |
* | update comment | Pascal Rigaux | 2007-08-28 | 1 | -1/+1 |
* | test fixed by new perl-URPM 1.76 | Pascal Rigaux | 2007-08-28 | 1 | -1/+1 |
* | better comment | Pascal Rigaux | 2007-08-22 | 1 | -1/+1 |
* | add a test case for #31969, need to fix urpmi now... | Pascal Rigaux | 2007-08-22 | 1 | -0/+33 |