- do allow to promoting a pkg even if it has unsatisfied require (since the

  code will then fix the unsatisfied require). fixes "big transaction" 
  (cf urpmi split-transactions--strict-require.t test_efgh())

this code was introduced long ago (*), the code has
changed quite a lot, and it's hard to tell for which reason it was introduced.
Maybe the check "obsoletes_overlap" replaces it for good?

(*) in "r11064 | fpons | 2002-06-13", search for "try if upgrading the package
will be satisfying all the requires"

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/URPM/Resolve.pm b/URPM/Resolve.pm
index 3619c62..3d3c3f8 100644
--- a/URPM/Resolve.pm
+++ b/URPM/Resolve.pm
@@ -1078,14 +1078,6 @@ sub _compute_diff_provides_of_removed_pkg {
 	}
 }
 
-sub _no_unsatisfied_requires {
-    my ($urpm, $db, $state, $pkg, $n) = @_;
-
-    my @l = unsatisfied_requires($urpm, $db, $state, $pkg, name => $n);
-    @l and $urpm->{debug_URPM}("  (not promoting " . $pkg->fullname . " because of @l)") if $urpm->{debug_URPM};
-    @l == 0;
-}
-
 #- side-effects: none
 sub _find_packages_obsoleting {
     my ($urpm, $state, $p) = @_;
@@ -1117,14 +1109,10 @@ sub _handle_diff_provides {
 	  grep { ($_->name eq $p->name ? $_->fullname ne $p->fullname :
 		    $_->obsoletes_overlap($p->name . " == " . $p->epoch . ":" . $p->version . "-" . $p->release))
 		   && (!strict_arch($urpm) || strict_arch_check($p, $_))
-		   && _no_unsatisfied_requires($urpm, $db, $state, $_, $n) 
 	     } @packages;
 
 	if (!@packages) {
 	    @packages = _find_packages_obsoleting($urpm, $state, $p);
-	    @packages = grep {
-		_no_unsatisfied_requires($urpm, $db, $state, $_, $n);
-	    } @packages;
 	}
 
 	if (@packages) {