| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Instead of placing the custom files with the upstream files it seems
clearer to have them mostly separated. This makes it easier to see which
parts are custom and which parts are more or less upstream.
As a result the upstream Makefile only needed minor changes to
accomodate this. The Makefile is NOT bug free, unfortunately it doesn't
always do the right thing, this due to inexperience.
|
| |\
| |
| |
| | |
10.04 release
|
| | | |
|
| | |
| |
| |
| | |
This concept is quite outdated, and not sane to use at all.
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
It has been agreed that maintainers of 'policycoreutils' will either
accept the pull-request, or they will close it if the sushell is no
longer needed...
|
| | |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
This script has been obsoleted by other concepts in Fedora, and using
it can be quite dangerous nowadays...
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
NOTE: This commit just moves files around, without actually fixing the
Makefiles and specfile. See follow up commits which resolve this.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
This has been dead for some time I believe. All desktops these days utilise
udisks for automounting and such like with proper ACL and access control
to the active user of the seat that the device/port belongs to.
|
| |
|
