From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009259.html | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009259.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009259.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009259.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009259.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..793eb9e86 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009259.html @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Review Of Bugs + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Review Of Bugs

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Mon Oct 31 22:44:56 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 21:06 +0000, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
+> 'Twas brillig, and Maarten Vanraes at 31/10/11 20:55 did gyre and gimble:
+> > Op maandag 31 oktober 2011 21:34:04 schreef D.Morgan:
+> > [...]
+> >>> But seriously, if we can't maintain/fix something like chromium-browser,
+> >>> we should just drop it completely, maybe have a get-chromium package
+> >>> instead
+> >>
+> >> why ? i package it regularly and tvignaud too.
+> >> what about dropping all packages that have bugs ?  this is just stupid
+> >> and you should first ask ppl packaging it before giving such ideas
+> > 
+> > ok, i get it, (allthough i did say "IF") I guess it's a misguided attempt of 
+> > myself to get more maintainership...
+> 
+> I think the attempts to get more official partnerships by Samuel and
+> yourself are very valuable, but by the same token, I think we need to
+> accept that having a single maintainer for some packages just doens't
+> make sense.
+> 
+> For example things like initscripts, udev, systemd etc. should be
+> maintained by a "core" team, and IMO, not a single person (tho' if
+> someone steps up and is proven to be reliable then this is obviously not
+> a bad thing per-se!). I'm certainly happy to help out here.
+
+Well, so far, the system do not support this.
+
+So either this supposed team is able to organise itself to have one of
+the member to act as a gate to take maitainership and dispatch task, or
+someone patch the maintdb script to have more than one person. 
+
+As long as "being managed by several people" will be seen the same way
+as "maintained by nobody", we will have the same problem as mandriva.
+
+Being maintained officially by someone do not prevent others to help. 
+So I do not see any good reason to have them marked as nobody.
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1