From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009127.html | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009127.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009127.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009127.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009127.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6c304618f --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009127.html @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] E17 packaging + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging

+ Florian Hubold + doktor5000 at arcor.de +
+ Wed Oct 26 10:45:21 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Am 26.10.2011 06:59, schrieb Michael Scherer:
+> Le samedi 22 octobre 2011 à 08:41 +0100, Philippe Reynes a écrit :
+>> Hi,
+>>
+>>
+>> I've tried to use E17, but it's an old version. I've asked e17 team,
+>> and they answered me that E17 is "rolling release". So no
+>> stable release (or vert vert few).
+>>
+>>
+>> I propose to package svn version, so we could be up-to-date.
+>> If a problem occurs, we could report it to upstream.
+>>
+>>
+>>
+>> What do you think about doing it on all E17 package ?
+> How will it go for stable support ?
+>
+> IE, once mageia 2 is out ?
+>
+We have better chances for bugfixes, don't think the snapshots which
+we used till now ( nearly one year old and also only based on
+the development release) will get some love anymore.
+
+For security issues, there were none that i'm aware of except for imlib2.
+
+But if you argument this way, we should stay with the packages we have
+until E17 is fully stable and release, but i don't see how this would be better.
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1