From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000627.html | 92 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000627.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000627.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000627.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000627.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0fdc069f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000627.html @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Sinner from the Prairy + sinnerbofh at gmail.com +
+ Fri Oct 1 22:05:46 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
atilla ontas wrote:
+
+> I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model.
+
+(...)
+
+> One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do
+> we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and
+> suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using
+> code names.
+ 
+> What's your opinion?
+
+I'd like 2 releases a year, plus a naming convention similar to current one 
+(2010.0, 2010.1).
+
+It makes it easy to figure out which version to install (think newcomer). 
+Also, I'd like to not do "Spring" "Fall"... , as Spring in the North is 
+Autumn in the South.
+
+Think globally.
+
+
+Salut,
+Sinner
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1