diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101029/002720.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101029/002720.html | 101 |
1 files changed, 101 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101029/002720.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101029/002720.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ee56f6d78 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101029/002720.html @@ -0,0 +1,101 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Mageia-discuss Digest, Vol 2, Issue 119 Package descriptions + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia-discuss%20Digest%2C%20Vol%202%2C%0A%20Issue%20119%20%20Package%20descriptions&In-Reply-To=%3C4CCA36B9.4060607%40laposte.net%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002735.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002721.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Mageia-discuss Digest, Vol 2, Issue 119 Package descriptions</H1> + <B>andre999</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia-discuss%20Digest%2C%20Vol%202%2C%0A%20Issue%20119%20%20Package%20descriptions&In-Reply-To=%3C4CCA36B9.4060607%40laposte.net%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Mageia-discuss Digest, Vol 2, Issue 119 Package descriptions">andr55 at laposte.net + </A><BR> + <I>Fri Oct 29 04:51:37 CEST 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002735.html">[Mageia-discuss] what aabout an automated way of doing it? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002721.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2720">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2720">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2720">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2720">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Ben a écrit : +><i> Perhaps the packagers and the backporters (assuming we have any) +</I>><i> should have their own digest mailing list. The packagers are very +</I>><i> busy but the backporters (community members with the basic knowledge +</I>><i> to make an RPM from Cauldron) would be proud and happy to make sense +</I>><i> of users package description suggestions and pass on a heads up to the +</I>><i> packager if a good suggestion comes along. It would cut down on the +</I>><i> noise that a true packager would have to wade through and, once a +</I>><i> relationship is developed between a packager and a backporter, +</I>><i> 'could' make the packagers job somewhat easier while at the same time +</I>><i> (assuming that the backporters are good community members i.e. IRC, +</I>><i> newbie and expert mailing list etc.) give users an easily accessible +</I>><i> point of contact for regular users. I think users would appreciate +</I>><i> this. Backporters would be glad to be a part of both the user and dev +</I>><i> community and packagers would be able to participate in the community +</I>><i> at the level they feel they are able to without feeling that they are +</I>><i> stretched thin. +</I>><i> While I'm on this subject. I think it might be a good idea to have +</I>><i> assigned backporters for packages or groups of packages. Just a thought. +</I>><i> benja22 +</I> +A backporter is a packager who makes a backport. Making a backport +could be more complex than making an ordinary package, since the +packager would have to adjust the dependancies of a more recent package +to match those available in a previous release. Otherwise installing +the package could involve considerable other downloads. + +Of course it wouldn't be a bad idea, as you suggest, for less +experienced packagers to focus on improving package descriptions. +There has already been suggestions of having "master" (experienced) and +"apprentice" (not-so-experienced) contributors for various functions, +including packaging. +This idea would fit well with that. + +As far as digests go, if you want to reply to something from a digest, +it would be better to remove all parts not pertaining to your response, +including the digest overhead. +This makes it easier for others to follow your logic. +(And if you plan to respond to a lot of posts, it might be better to +subscribe to the usual individual post list.) + +- André +</PRE> + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002735.html">[Mageia-discuss] what aabout an automated way of doing it? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002721.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2720">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2720">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2720">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2720">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |