summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100929/001524.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100929/001524.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100929/001524.html132
1 files changed, 132 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100929/001524.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100929/001524.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..926ca014d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100929/001524.html
@@ -0,0 +1,132 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Package management system
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Package%20management%20system&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTikaQwW0FhmzNk7p_04GAkefjZyXxW43SsfndTVf%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001520.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001527.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Package management system</H1>
+ <B>Lirodon</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Package%20management%20system&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTikaQwW0FhmzNk7p_04GAkefjZyXxW43SsfndTVf%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Package management system">superfox436 at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Sep 29 03:46:34 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001520.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001527.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1524">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1524">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1524">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1524">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Doesn't packagekit provide Gnome and KDE-native interfaces for package
+management?
+
+Shawn
+
+On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Richard &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">richard.j.walker at ntlworld.com</A>&gt;wrote:
+
+&gt;<i> On Tuesday 28 September 2010 23:42:21 Renaud MICHEL wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; No, if you are talking about rpmdrake, you should compare it to synaptic.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I you want to talk about apt (be it apt-get or aptitude), you should
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; compare it to urpmi, and urpmi (in my opinion) is not slow.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> Agreed. Though I am not by any means a command line junkie I will always
+</I>&gt;<i> use
+</I>&gt;<i> uprmi when I know exactly what I want.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So it is synaptic/apt and rpmdrake/urpmi. No doubt yum has a GUI
+</I>&gt;<i> counterpart
+</I>&gt;<i> too.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; emerge and macports are source-based &quot;packet&quot; managers.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; As the programs are compiled when you want to install them, you can
+</I>&gt;<i> decide
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; to exclude some optional, compile-time functionality, and avoid their
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; dependencies.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; In pre-compiled packets (like rpm or deb), the packager decided what
+</I>&gt;<i> should
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; be compiled, and so what are the required dependencies.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; You still have the option to get the source package and tweak it (via the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; spec file for rpm, or rule for deb) to exclude some things you don't
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; require. (but you will need to do it again each time an update is
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; available)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> Right, I have done this with a custom ffmpeg build. Compile time dependency
+</I>&gt;<i> control is, of course, a grace and favour benefit provided by the program
+</I>&gt;<i> author. I get the impression that a packager can introduce depencies when
+</I>&gt;<i> special support is needed for extra features he may choose to include. This
+</I>&gt;<i> seems to be what happened with the 2010.1 issue of the foobillard rpm where
+</I>&gt;<i> a
+</I>&gt;<i> new dependency on Pulse has been created which does not exist in the 2010.0
+</I>&gt;<i> package or the author's source.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Packages have dependencies, those are interpreted as &quot;this package cannot
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; work without those&quot;.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; You can also have less strict recommendations, deb has provided for long
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; recommended packages (not really required, but a must have) and suggested
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; packages (is an interesting addition, but nothing essential).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Rpm also provide such a mechanism (though I think is younger than deb)
+</I>&gt;<i> with
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; the suggested packages.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Urpmi take the suggested packages into account, when installing it will
+</I>&gt;<i> by
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; default selected also the suggested packages, but you can add the --no-
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; suggests option to avoid this.
+</I>&gt;<i> Does this mean that I can find the KDE packages which &quot;depend&quot; on Pulse and
+</I>&gt;<i> re-package them such that Pulse is only &quot;recommended&quot;? If so then I will
+</I>&gt;<i> have
+</I>&gt;<i> to find the way to set the --no-suggests option in rpmdrake. I hadn't even
+</I>&gt;<i> looked for it before as I have only recently started to discover problems
+</I>&gt;<i> in
+</I>&gt;<i> Mandriva packages.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On the urpme side, if you uninstall a package that was installed as a
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; suggestion, it won't trigger the uninstallation of the package that
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; suggested it.
+</I>&gt;<i> Something similar seems to apply to packages which I inadvertently &quot;mark&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i> as
+</I>&gt;<i> manually installed. urpme reports that such packages will be excluded from
+</I>&gt;<i> orphan detection. I love the --auto-orphans switch.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Richard
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: &lt;/pipermail/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100928/1234722a/attachment.html&gt;
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001520.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001527.html">[Mageia-discuss] Package management system
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1524">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1524">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1524">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1524">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>