diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html | 137 |
1 files changed, 137 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e4c98debd --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C201012051959.19859.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001606.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001608.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two</H1> + <B>Maarten Vanraes</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C201012051959.19859.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Sun Dec 5 19:59:19 CET 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001606.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001608.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1607">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1607">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1607">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1607">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Op zaterdag 04 december 2010 21:32:51 schreef andre999: +><i> Dale Huckeby a écrit : +</I>><i> > On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, andre999 wrote: +</I>><i> >> John a écrit : +</I>><i> >>> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:28:26 +0100 +</I>><i> >>> +</I>><i> >>> Maarten Vanraes wrote: +</I>><i> >>>> Op vrijdag 03 december 2010 10:45:05 schreef Ahmad Samir: +</I>><i> >>>> [...] +</I>><i> >>>> +</I>><i> >>>>> The kernel uses the word "tainted" when it detects the nvidia +</I>><i> >>>>> proprietary module for example, (which admittedly gave me a bit of +</I>><i> >>>>> shock the first time I saw it :)). +</I>><i> >>>> +</I>><i> >>>> Heh, i had the same reaction. +</I>><i> >>>> +</I>><i> >>>>> From all the proposed names, I think "tainted" is the best one, as +</I>><i> >>>>> the +</I>><i> >>>>> +</I>><i> >>>>> packages in there are in a "grey" zone, i.e. not totally illegal +</I>><i> >>>>> everywhere, but illegal only in some places in the world. And in +</I>><i> >>>>> reality the existence of a patent doesn't necessarily mean it's +</I>><i> >>>>> enforceable in a court of law (the only way we'd know for sure is if +</I>><i> >>>>> someone actually does try to sue)... my 0.02€ worth :) +</I>><i> >> +</I>><i> >> Generally only potentially "illegal" in some countries. +</I>><i> >> "Tainted" means contaminated, polluted. A lot stronger than +</I>><i> >> potentially "illegal". (Really only actionable in a civil sense, not +</I>><i> >> criminally illegal, as well.) +</I>><i> >> A package could end up there due to an apparently credible rumour, +</I>><i> >> later discredited. (Anyone remember SCO ?) +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > I agree. Problematic comes closer to "potentially illegal", so I looked +</I>><i> > up some synonyms: ambiguous, debatable, dubious, +</I>><i> > iffy, suspect, speculative, precarious, suspicious, uncertain, +</I>><i> > unsettled, in addition to problematic itself. Personally +</I>><i> > I like iffy, which is both short and to the point, but I think several +</I>><i> > of these would do. WDYT? +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > Dale Huckeby +</I>><i> +</I>><i> A much better set of choices. +</I>><i> (Thanks for looking these up. Good idea.) +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Let's remember that the question for these packages is not the quality +</I>><i> of their functioning - but rather the advisability to use them, for +</I>><i> other reasons, in some countries. +</I>><i> So I think that it is better to avoid words that could question the +</I>><i> QUALITY of the packages. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Words in the list like +</I>><i> ambiguous, debatable, problematic, and speculative +</I>><i> avoid questioning the quality ... but could be too long or too formal. +</I>><i> Or just not catchy enough ;) +</I>><i> ("Iffy" might be ok - certainly catchy enough.) +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Additional words I found in Roget's thesaurus, along the same lines : +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Associated more with debatable : +</I>><i> arguable, contestable, controvertible, disputable, questionable, +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Associated more with controversial : +</I>><i> confutable, deniable, mistakable, moot +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Of these additional words, I think that "contestable", "disputable", and +</I>><i> "controversial" are probably closest to the SENSE of the repositories. +</I>><i> But maybe too formal ? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Many of these words could be good choices. +</I>><i> And maybe someone will come up with some more ? +</I>><i> +</I>><i> my 2 cents :) +</I>><i> +</I>><i> - André +</I> + +i like speculative +</PRE> + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001606.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001608.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#1607">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#1607">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#1607">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#1607">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |