summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
committerNicolas Vigier <boklm@mageia.org>2013-04-14 13:46:12 +0000
commit1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 (patch)
treeb175f9d5fcb107576dabc768e7bd04d4a3e491a0 /zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html
parentfa5098cf210b23ab4f419913e28af7b1b07dafb2 (diff)
downloadarchives-master.tar
archives-master.tar.gz
archives-master.tar.bz2
archives-master.tar.xz
archives-master.zip
Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html137
1 files changed, 137 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e4c98debd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101205/001607.html
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C201012051959.19859.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001606.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001608.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two</H1>
+ <B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout%2C%20round%20two&In-Reply-To=%3C201012051959.19859.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Dec 5 19:59:19 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001606.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001608.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1607">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1607">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1607">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1607">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Op zaterdag 04 december 2010 21:32:51 schreef andre999:
+&gt;<i> Dale Huckeby a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On Sat, 4 Dec 2010, andre999 wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; John a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; On Fri, 3 Dec 2010 11:28:26 +0100
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Op vrijdag 03 december 2010 10:45:05 schreef Ahmad Samir:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; [...]
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The kernel uses the word &quot;tainted&quot; when it detects the nvidia
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; proprietary module for example, (which admittedly gave me a bit of
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; shock the first time I saw it :)).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Heh, i had the same reaction.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; From all the proposed names, I think &quot;tainted&quot; is the best one, as
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; packages in there are in a &quot;grey&quot; zone, i.e. not totally illegal
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; everywhere, but illegal only in some places in the world. And in
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; reality the existence of a patent doesn't necessarily mean it's
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; enforceable in a court of law (the only way we'd know for sure is if
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; someone actually does try to sue)... my 0.02&#8364; worth :)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; Generally only potentially &quot;illegal&quot; in some countries.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &quot;Tainted&quot; means contaminated, polluted. A lot stronger than
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; potentially &quot;illegal&quot;. (Really only actionable in a civil sense, not
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; criminally illegal, as well.)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; A package could end up there due to an apparently credible rumour,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; later discredited. (Anyone remember SCO ?)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I agree. Problematic comes closer to &quot;potentially illegal&quot;, so I looked
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; up some synonyms: ambiguous, debatable, dubious,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; iffy, suspect, speculative, precarious, suspicious, uncertain,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; unsettled, in addition to problematic itself. Personally
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I like iffy, which is both short and to the point, but I think several
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; of these would do. WDYT?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Dale Huckeby
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> A much better set of choices.
+</I>&gt;<i> (Thanks for looking these up. Good idea.)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Let's remember that the question for these packages is not the quality
+</I>&gt;<i> of their functioning - but rather the advisability to use them, for
+</I>&gt;<i> other reasons, in some countries.
+</I>&gt;<i> So I think that it is better to avoid words that could question the
+</I>&gt;<i> QUALITY of the packages.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Words in the list like
+</I>&gt;<i> ambiguous, debatable, problematic, and speculative
+</I>&gt;<i> avoid questioning the quality ... but could be too long or too formal.
+</I>&gt;<i> Or just not catchy enough ;)
+</I>&gt;<i> (&quot;Iffy&quot; might be ok - certainly catchy enough.)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Additional words I found in Roget's thesaurus, along the same lines :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Associated more with debatable :
+</I>&gt;<i> arguable, contestable, controvertible, disputable, questionable,
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Associated more with controversial :
+</I>&gt;<i> confutable, deniable, mistakable, moot
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Of these additional words, I think that &quot;contestable&quot;, &quot;disputable&quot;, and
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;controversial&quot; are probably closest to the SENSE of the repositories.
+</I>&gt;<i> But maybe too formal ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Many of these words could be good choices.
+</I>&gt;<i> And maybe someone will come up with some more ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> my 2 cents :)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> - Andr&#233;
+</I>
+
+i like speculative
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001606.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001608.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout, round two
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1607">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1607">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1607">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1607">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>