perl-URPM - Perl RPM Manipulation Module

	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Age	Files	Lines
*	- create _add_group() out of sort_graph() for future use	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-28	1	-25/+26
\| \| \| \| \|	- cleanup
*	move things (prepare for next commit)	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-28	1	-3/+3
\|
*	indent debug message so that "conflict above" message can still be meaningful	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-28	1	-1/+1
\|
*	more debug message	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-28	1	-3/+11
\|
*	simplify (don't compute twice $_->fullname ne $p->fullname when we already	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-28	1	-3/+2
\| \| \| \| \|	know $_->name ne $p->name)
*	- handle promotion via obsolete, not only provides	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-27	1	-0/+12
\|
*	fix previous commit	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-27	1	-4/+3
\|
*	simplify	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-27	1	-2/+3
\|
*	- fix bug doing "urpmi kernel-source"	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-20	1	-5/+5
\| \| \| \| \|	("find" must be seen by perl compiler before using it)
*	in case one do "urpmi kernel-devel", $requested will be	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-18	1	-1/+1
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	{ 'id1\|id2\|...' => 1 }, and not { 'kernel-devel' => 1 } as would be prefered. this need to be changed in urpmi. But we still want to display the correct things here.
*	- choose every kernel-<flavor>-devel-<version> packages when	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-17	1	-8/+21
\| \| \| \| \|	kernel-<flavor>-<version> is selected
*	create _is_selected_or_installed() out of _score_for_locales()	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-17	1	-2/+8
\|
*	simplify	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-14	1	-1/+1
\|
*	- fix regression in 2.00: keep_unrequested_dependencies is still used by	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-14	1	-1/+6
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	installer. restore it, but must now be set trough $urpm->{keep_unrequested_dependencies} - add some more debug info
*	- fix bug occurring with --keep	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-14	1	-8/+5
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	(thanks to akurtakov for reporting it on #mandriva-cooker) the fix is to drop field {psel} from {backport}, it's unused anyway
*	properly handle the reason for a conflict.	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-13	1	-5/+5
\| \| \| \| \| \|	this broke in commit "it really seems {why}{conflicts} is only used for debugging purpose, so this change won't break."
*	- handle promote from installed package which require a unselected package,	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-13	1	-14/+22
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	whereas new package does not require it anymore (cf test_d & test_e from split-transactions--conflict urpmi test case) the idea is: - resolve_rejected is wrong, since it blindly removes installed pkgs without trying to promote anything - @diff_provides can be nicely used to handle rejecting package one by one - _handle_diff_provides do handle promotion of new packages
*	prepare next commit	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-13	1	-14/+13
\|
*	rename _handle_provides_overlap() to _handle_conflict()	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-13	1	-5/+5
\| \| \| \| \|	(much better name)
*	create _compute_diff_provides_of_removed_pkg() out of ↵	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-13	1	-1/+8
\| \| \| \|	_unselect_package_deprecated_by_property()
*	fix doc	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-13	1	-1/+1
\|
*	rename _compute_diff_provides() to _unselect_package_deprecated_by()	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-13	1	-7/+7
\| \| \| \| \|	(since it really does much more than computing diff_provides)
*	update doc	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-13	1	-2/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \| \| \|	(it changed because of commit: set_rejected() must do things even if _set_rejected_from has been done on the same package. this removes the need for a special case)
*	create _add_rejected_backtrack() and use it	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-13	1	-7/+20
\|
*	use set_rejected() in _compute_diff_provides_one(),	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-14/+16
\| \| \| \| \|	nb: the change is not neutral in the "unselected_uninstalled" case
*	enhance previous commit: {rejected_pkg} is much better than {required_pkg}	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-11/+11
\|
*	resolve_rejected_() and set_rejected() now use a $rdep parameter	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-31/+39
\|
*	set_rejected() must do things even if _set_rejected_from has been done on the	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-8/+9
\| \| \| \| \|	same package. this removes the need for a special case
*	better indicate the test case in urpmi	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-1/+1
\|
*	update doc	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-1/+0
\|
*	update doc	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-2/+3
\|
*	update doc	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-1/+2
\|
*	create _remove_all_rejected_from() out of disable_selected()	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-6/+10
\|
*	create _remove_rejected_from()	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-4/+16
\|
*	update doc	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-3/+7
\|
*	factorize code into _set_rejected_from()	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-7/+13
\|
*	replacing {backtrack}{closure} with {closure} since it looks like it was a typo	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-2/+2
\|
*	update doc	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-1/+2
\|
*	- fix typo in previous commit: pass $urpm to set_selected() for debug message	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-9/+9
\| \| \| \| \| \|	- {from} options to resolve_rejected_ and set_selected is now a pkg object instead of a fullname string
*	add debug message	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-5/+6
\|
*	simplify	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-8/+4
\|
*	handle {size} in set_rejected()	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-8/+11
\|
*	- add ability to merge {closure} fields in set_rejected (from $options{why})	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-13/+13
\| \| \| \| \| \| \|	- {from} is a fullname here - {why} is a hash - use set_rejected() to factorize code
*	cleanup	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-2/+2
\|
*	fix typo in previous commit	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-1/+1
\|
*	create set_rejected() out of resolve_rejected_()	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-10/+22
\|
*	dep field "choices" is here for debug purpose, rename it _choices	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-1/+1
\|
*	create _dep_to_name() and use it	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-5/+10
\|
*	drop unused option "closure_as_removed"	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-1/+0
\|
*	backtrack_selected() was always returning empty list, so	Pascal Rigaux	2007-09-12	1	-3/+2
\| \| \| \| \| \|	backtrack_selected_psel_keep() should return empty list. but it's simply to modify callers to take into account the return value is ()