diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'ChangeLog')
| -rw-r--r-- | ChangeLog | 1241 |
1 files changed, 1241 insertions, 0 deletions
@@ -1,3 +1,1244 @@ +2010-07-23 02:43 + + * - fix deferencement on hash (instead hashref), warning triggered + by perl 5.12 + +2010-04-23 16:06 + + * only print debug message if debug callback is defined + +2010-04-23 15:40 + + * 3.35 + +2010-04-23 15:39 + + * honour search medias when using --auto-select + +2010-03-23 15:48 + + * 3.34.1 + +2010-03-23 15:47 + + * check selected packages for unsatisfied requires when a promoted + package is backtracked and no replacement is found + + (#57224, Anssi Hannula) + +2010-03-23 15:47 + + * 3.34 + +2010-02-24 11:01 + + * adjust rpm.org/rpm5.org detection code + + It used to assume that rpm.org had version numbers < 4.7, but + it's + no longer true with rpm 4.8 being released. Test against 5.0 + since + rpm5.org releases started at 5.0 + +2010-02-12 15:58 + + * check for conflicting selected packages before selecting a + package + + check for conflicting selected packages before selecting a + package + instead of after selecting it, to avoid having to unselect + package + in case of conflict (which incorrectly unselected packages with + unsatisfied dependencies as well, making the following + backtrack_selected + call behave wrongly as it simply noticed that the package is no + longer + required) + + Here's the second patch again, now with the function comment + updated + and added _remove_all_rejected_from() call so that prerejections + are + still cleared (this was previously called from the + removed disable_selected() call). Testsuites pass. + + Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes #57224 + +2009-10-05 09:48 + + * 3.33 + +2009-10-03 15:18 + + * Improve previous fix + +2009-10-03 14:56 + + * fix lookup of existing pubkeys (#53710) + +2009-08-10 14:37 + + * update NEWS for 3.32 + +2009-08-10 14:37 + + * 3.32 + +2009-08-10 14:37 + + * comment out unused code + +2009-08-10 14:37 + + * use set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides for package removal + + Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52667 + + k1-1 provides k, but not k1-2 + l-1 and l-2 requires k + m-1 requires k but not m-2 + n requires m + + User has l-1, m-1, n-1, k1-1. + + There is only one upgrade path: + k1-1 -> k1-2 + m-1 -> m-2 + removal of l-1 + + When transaction is created with all of them (e.g. what + --auto-select does + first), the path is resolved correctly. + However, when the upgrade is triggered with the upgrade of k1, + and l is in RPM + db before n, resolving proceeds as follows: + 1. k1 selected and old version rejected + 2. l is promoted + 3. m is promoted + 4. l-2 is therefore selected + 5. no packages are found for k (as k1-1 was rejected in step 1) + 6. backtrack_selected calls resolve_rejected to reject the chain + 7. rejection process rejects l, m, n + 8. m-2 is selected because of step 3 + End result: n is wrongly removed. + + Therefore, when using --auto-select (with --split-length 1 + --split-level 1 in + this small case, to force splitting) to trigger the upgrade, the + early resolve + is done correctly, but the first splitted transaction ("rpms + sorted by + dependencies" has k1 and m separately, so split is tried) tries + to remove n and + URPM fallbacks to single big transaction. + + In reverse, when using "urpmi k1" to trigger the upgrade, urpmi + asks user + confirmation for n removal, but the transaction is created with + both k1 and m + ("rpms sorted by dependencies" has k1+m, so they are put in same + transaction), + thus triggering the correct behaviour and n is not really removed + after all, + even if user agreed to it. + + Attached patch fixes this by switching backtrack_selected() to + use + set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides() for package removal + instead of + resolve_rejected_(). The code already contained a comment + indicating that + diff_provides code should be applied. + The patch introduces no regression in the urpmi and perl-URPM + testsuites. + +2009-08-05 20:24 + + * Obey options (keep, nodeps) when unselecting current package in + the case + that was added in 3.31 (Anssi Hannula). In a simple mistake, + %options was + not passed to backtrack_selected. + +2009-08-05 20:17 + + * remove extra newline from NEWS + +2009-08-05 11:15 + + * remove no longer used SPEC_VERIFY constant + +2009-08-04 16:47 + + * disttag & distepoch isn't utf8… + +2009-08-04 16:28 + + * cast (es-s) to U32 (as the hv_fetch prototype expects) rather + than casting strlen(s) to signed + +2009-07-28 16:15 + + * 3.31 + +2009-07-28 16:15 + + * we need to link with rpmbuild with rpm 4.6 + +2009-07-28 13:16 + + * update NEWS file + +2009-07-28 13:16 + + * add a backtrack entry "conflicts" for avoided packages in + backtrack_selected + + Patch from Anssi Hannula, fixes part of bug #52153 + +2009-07-28 13:15 + + * do not try to promote to an older package + + Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52460 + + When searching for possible promotions, _handle_diff_provides() + allows + downgrade as well as upgrade. + + However, downgrade is not currently supported, and will fail + early in + _no_more_recent_installed_and_providing(), called from + resolve_requested__no_suggests_(). + + As no backtracking is done for early failures in this function + (should it be? + dunno), the promotion gets forgotten and a failing transaction + will occur. + + Simple fix is to only allow upgrade before doing the promotion. + Patch attached. + It introduces no regressions in urpmi or perl-URPM testsuite. + +2009-07-28 13:15 + + * unselect current package if an avoided package is already + selected + + Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52145 + + If package 'a' Conflicts on 'b', and user (or a dependency chain) + tries to + install both at the same time, perl-URPM will only detect the + conflict if + package 'a' gets selected first (this depends on hdlist order), + as + _set_rejected_from is only called in one direction from + _handle_conflicts and + it does not detect that a package it is about to reject_from is + already + selected. + + This bug currently causes a failure in urpmi + handle-conflict-deps2 testcase. + + This commit checks if avoided package is already selected, and + unselects + current package in such a case + +2009-07-28 13:15 + + * move part of _handle_conflicts to _handle_conflicts_with_selected + + Patch by Anssi Hannula, first step toward fixing bug #52145 + + If package 'a' Conflicts on 'b', and user (or a dependency chain) + tries to + install both at the same time, perl-URPM will only detect the + conflict if + package 'a' gets selected first (this depends on hdlist order), + as + _set_rejected_from is only called in one direction from + _handle_conflicts and + it does not detect that a package it is about to reject_from is + already + selected. + + This patch moves part of _handle_conflicts to + _handle_conflicts_with_selected + to be called before dependencies get added, needed by next patch + +2009-07-28 13:14 + + * _handle_conflicts: check all provides for conflicts, not just + package name + + Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52135 + + If package a has "Conflicts: x" and b has "Provides: x", + installing both at the + same time creates a failing transaction (instead of producing the + "cannot + install a (or b), continue?") as perl-URPM does not detect the + conflict, as it + just checks the conflicts on the package name (it does the + correct thing with + installed packages, though). + + _handle_conflicts: call _set_rejected_from if any provides match + the conflict, + instead of just package name + +2009-07-28 13:13 + + * keep psel/promote info and remove deadlocked pkg instead of + aborting upgrade + + Patch from Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52105 + + lib64gcj9 has to be removed (conflicts), therefore so does + libgcj9-src (x86_64) + that depends on it. Installed java-1.5.0-gcj-src depends on + libgcj9-src, so + perl-URPM tries to promote the i586 libgcj9-src for it. However, + strict_arch + check prohibits changing the arch, so it falls back to + backtracking. + Backtracking finds libgcj9-src again and tries to select it; + however, it drops + $dep->{psel} and $dep->{promote}, so when it fails again, + perl-URPM does not + know java-1.5.0-gcj-src should also be removed due to the failed + promotion. + + This patch changes the code in backtrack_selected in two ways: + + 1) When a replacement package is found, keep {promote} and {psel} + info, so that + when backtrack_selected is run the second time it correctly + handles the failed + promotion. + 2) When such a replacement fails as well and the deadlock + protection is + triggered, do not switch to keep mode for the package that caused + the promotion + (it would unselect all the packages involved in the update that + caused the + promotion). Instead proceed to remove it as usual. + + The patch introduces no failures on the urpmi testsuite. + +2009-07-28 13:12 + + * keep track of sources for obsoleted/removed levels + + Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #50666 + + removed/obsoleted levels are set in set_rejected() when a package + is rejected + (i.e. removed) or a rejection reason is added. They keep track on + whether the + package is removed and/or obsoleted. + + When the package has both flags and one of the rejection reasons + is removed by + _remove_rejected_from(), appropriate flags do not get removed. + + The case I encountered: the package is set for removal when a + package it + depends on fails upgrade due to unsatisfied dependency and has to + be removed + (backtrack_selected => resolve_rejected, causing removed=1), and + the package is + then promoted (causing obsoleted=1). However, the promotion fails + due to the + same unsatisfied dependency and backtrack_selected => + disable_selected_and_unrequested_dependencies => disable_selected + => + _remove_all_rejected_from => _remove_rejected_from gets called. + This removes + the latter rejection reason, but leaves flags, including the now + wrong + obsoleted=1. Thus the package is not explicitely removed as an + obsoletion is + assumed, therefore failing the transaction. + +2009-07-27 12:42 + + * use pkg-config for rpm 4.x too + +2009-07-27 12:41 + + * remove unused variable + +2009-07-26 16:07 + + * rephrase wording, only support for querying %disttag & %distepoch + so far, no support + for using %distepoch i version comparisions yet... + +2009-07-26 16:06 + + * add support for %disttag & %distepoch + +2009-07-26 08:36 + + * just use (void) rather than assign rpmtsFree() since it seems to + cause crashy behaviour certain places... + +2009-07-26 08:07 + + * bumping version was forgotten for 3.30 release, might as well + bump it up to + 3.31 now for next release… + +2009-07-26 08:05 + + * update changelog regarding rpm5 + +2009-07-26 07:08 + + * oops, put back line that accidentally got removed in the previous + commit… + +2009-07-26 06:50 + + * enable and fix additional (-Wextra) warnings + +2009-07-26 06:38 + + * fix gcc warnings about values not being used + +2009-07-26 06:23 + + * * clean out compatibility code for older rpm versions that's not + really + supported anymore anyways and move out as much as possible + rpm5.org + compatibility code out of URPM into new rpm46compat.h @ rpm5.org + +2009-07-25 20:50 + + * add support for specifying custom filter for compression with + build_synthesis() + +2009-07-22 18:21 + + * really clean up temporary files & directories properly + +2009-07-22 18:19 + + * prevent distepoch & disttag to be added and appended to package + filename + +2009-05-11 13:26 + + * Removed forgotten debugging logs + +2009-05-11 13:22 + + * Add bug # + +2009-05-11 13:17 + + * Release 3.30 + +2009-05-11 13:17 + + * Use key IDs to check if a key is already known or not + + This has the side-effect that if we get a newer public key + corresponding + to an already known key id, it won't get updated, but for now RPM + doesn't let us do that anyway. If a pubkey file contains multiple + keys, + we no longer handle this case, but I don't think this has been + widely + tested, if ever... + +2009-05-11 13:17 + + * Fix comment + +2009-05-11 13:17 + + * Introduce get_gpg_fingerprint XS function + +2009-03-27 14:58 + + * 3.29 + +2009-03-27 14:58 + + * Fix regression introduced in fix for bug #47803 + + This reverts the previous commit + + only compute diff_provides when the package is newly rejected, in + set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides + + Try this incremental patch. It fixes + set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides to + not compute diff_provides if package was already rejected (and + thus the + dependencies properly handled already). + +2009-03-27 10:28 + + * Revert part of the fix for bug #47803 since it breaks upgrades + from 2008.1 + +2009-03-25 13:41 + + * 3.28: + +2009-03-25 13:22 + + * Postpone user choices as much as possible + + Fixes bug #48100, patch from Anssi Hannula + Package A requires D and E. + Package B provides D and E. + Package C provides E. + + If the require on E happens to be resolved first, then perl-URPM + will + prompt the user, even though installing B is enough. + +2009-03-24 16:50 + + * Change format of "rpm sorted by dependencies" string + +2009-03-24 15:55 + + * 3.27 + +2009-03-23 10:03 + + * Don't silently install Suggests:, fixes bug #47934 + + When installing a package which suggests an uninstalled package, + urpmi + currently installs both packages without asking the user while it + asks + when installing a package which requires an uninstalled package. + This is + because we call resolve_requested__no_suggests to find which + suggested + package to install, but this mark the package as requested as + well (and + we don't ask for confirmation before installing a requested + package). + This patch calls resolve_requested__no_suggests_ (with a trailing + '_') + instead which is the same as resolve_requested__no_suggests but + does not + mark the packages as requested. + +2009-03-23 09:40 + + * fix _handle_diff_provides in case of impossible-to-satisfy + selected packages + + Fixes bug #48223, patch from Anssi Hannula + + Currently, if _handle_diff_provides finds unsatisfied requires on + an already + selected package, and cannot find any packages from the repo that + satisfy + these, it calls resolve_rejected_ (or + set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides + after fix to bug #47803) (as it does when those unsatisfied + requires are on an + installed package, which was always the case before r242656). + However, those should be called with installed packages only. + + Attached patch makes _handle_diff_provides call + disable_selected_and_unrequested_dependencies and + _set_rejected_from in case of + selected packages. + +2009-03-20 18:32 + + * check rep for another pkg providing X if the prev pkg gets + removed due to a conflict + + Fixes bug #47803, patch from Anssi Hannula + + Closer look at urpmi revealed it only does this if a provide X is + removed from + an upgraded package, not when a package providing X has to be + removed. + + i.e. this works: + + A provides foo + B provides foo + C requires foo + + Installed A,C. + + A is upgraded and Provides:foo is dropped, B gets installed in + order to + keep C. + + But this won't: + + A provides foo + A requires dep + B provides foo + C requires foo + D provides dep + + Installed A,C,D. + + D is upgraded and Provides:dep is dropped, A gets removed, C gets + removed. + +2009-03-05 11:14 + + * 3.26 + +2009-03-05 11:13 + + * (verify_signature) make checking urpmi signatures works in + chrooted environments + (especially important for installer where there's no rpmdb in / + (really + /var/lib/rpm) and thus no keys to check against) + +2009-01-16 14:48 + + * Release 3.25 + +2009-01-16 14:48 + + * Really fix bug #46874 + +2009-01-13 14:27 + + * Version 3.24 - 13 January 2009, by Christophe Fergeau + + - fix sorting choices on provided version (feature introduced in + 3.08, + but was not working if packages were coming from different + repository) + - when a "Requires:" can be fullfilled by several different + packages and + one of those packages is explicitly required by another package + which + is also being installed, silently choose this package instead of + letting + the choice up to perl-URPM user (fixes bug #46874) + +2009-01-12 08:04 + + * add comments + +2009-01-12 08:03 + + * - drop parse_rpms (unused, parse_rpms_build_headers or parse_rpm + are used instead) + - add a comment + +2009-01-12 07:59 + + * add a comment + +2009-01-12 07:56 + + * - drop function fuzzy_parse() (it is unused) + - add some comment + +2009-01-09 14:40 + + * add a comment + +2009-01-09 14:39 + + * add some comment + +2009-01-09 14:24 + + * - @unsatisfied is a better var name than @l + - add some comment + +2009-01-08 13:46 + + * make it clear the func is local + +2009-01-08 13:45 + + * add a comment + +2009-01-08 09:24 + + * Favour required packages when we have several choices to fulfill + a "requires", fixes bug #46874 + +2009-01-06 15:55 + + * - add some comment + - enhance a comment + +2009-01-06 14:05 + + * document a "hack" + +2008-12-15 17:02 + + * - fix sorting choices on provided version (feature introduced in + 3.08, + but was not working if packages were coming from different + repository) + +2008-12-15 11:08 + + * 3.23 + +2008-12-15 11:05 + + * - fix bad free() (thanks to glibc for detecting it) + +2008-12-12 11:04 + + * 3.22 + +2008-12-12 09:19 + + * - fix scriptlet failing: + adapt to librpm4.6, rpmtsSetRootDir(ts, "") is forbidden + +2008-12-09 16:40 + + * revert wrong commit + +2008-12-09 16:33 + + * correctly clean temp directories + +2008-12-09 16:05 + + * 3.21 + +2008-12-09 16:04 + + * - adapt to librpm4.6 + +2008-12-09 16:03 + + * - adapt to rpm 4.6 changes: + - headerNextIterator -> headerNext + - headerAddEntry -> headerPut + - headerModifyEntry -> headerMod + +2008-12-09 16:02 + + * - adapt to rpm 4.6 changes: headerGetEntry -> headerGet + +2008-12-09 16:00 + + * - adapt to some easy rpm 4.6 changes: + - headerSprintf -> headerFormat + - headerAddEntry -> headerPutString + - headerRemoveEntry -> headerDel + - rpmProblemGetLong -> rpmProblemGetDiskNeed + +2008-12-09 15:55 + + * free the iterator *after* use + (otherwise it segfaults with 4.6.0-rc1, and i wonder how it + worked before...) + +2008-12-09 15:52 + + * do free the ts after user, this is especially needed since + rpmVerifySignature + (wrongly) called in rpmReadPackageFile can open the rpmdb which + won't get + closed if ts is not closed + +2008-12-09 15:50 + + * - don't handle %_sourcedir specially, it's not needed + - use an absolute filename for %_topdir, it seems to help + (bug in rpm 4.6.0-rc1?) + +2008-12-09 15:49 + + * - list_rpm_tag() is no more + - remove a failing test (old) + +2008-12-09 15:47 + + * - drop list_rpm_tag() + +2008-12-09 15:45 + + * adapt types to rpm-4.6.x + +2008-12-08 17:35 + + * fix rpmRelocation usage with rpm 5.2 + +2008-10-14 17:35 + + * 3.20 + +2008-10-14 17:35 + + * - $trans->run can now return both the translated errors, and some + parsable + errors (useful for example to detect diskspace issues) + +2008-10-14 08:51 + + * use rpmuint64_t rather than long long, we know that it should + stay compatible:) + +2008-10-10 09:14 + + * fix build with rpm5.org HEAD + +2008-10-07 10:47 + + * 3.19 + +2008-10-07 10:46 + + * - handle flag "replacefiles" + +2008-07-18 18:09 + + * add filelinktos() & dirnames() to URPM::Package + +2008-07-17 20:03 + + * ensure that initSourceHeader gets run for rpm5.org, otherwise + querying of spec files won't work + +2008-07-14 16:49 + + * fix build with rpm5.org HEAD + +2008-07-07 21:53 + + * 3.18 + +2008-07-07 14:08 + + * - revert change introduced in 3.16 (it breaks too much, eg + superuser--priority-upgrade.t test case), and introduce + $state->{rejected_already_installed} instead + +2008-07-07 13:23 + + * fix typo in description + +2008-07-04 13:06 + + * 3.17 + +2008-07-04 13:05 + + * add removed_or_obsoleted_packages() + +2008-07-04 13:04 + + * - handle $state->{orphans_to_remove} in selected_size() and + build_transaction_set() + +2008-07-04 11:25 + + * - add traverse_tag_find() + +2008-07-03 11:25 + + * perl_checker compliance + +2008-07-03 11:23 + + * remove unused vars + +2008-07-03 11:22 + + * create packages_to_remove() and use it to factorize code + +2008-07-01 15:26 + + * create rpmtag_from_string() out of Db_traverse_tag + +2008-06-26 12:47 + + * 3.16 + +2008-06-26 09:46 + + * - when not selecting a package because already installed, + but it in $state->{rejected} with flags {installed} + +2008-06-24 09:06 + + * adapt tests to ->compare change + +2008-06-23 08:42 + + * 3.15 + +2008-06-17 09:39 + + * add Anssi name in the log + +2008-06-17 09:38 + + * - fix urpmi wrongly considering epochless conflicts to match any + epoch in a + case when urpmi should upgrade a conflicting package to an + actually + non-conflicting version (cf epochless-conflict-with-promotion + urpmi test) + + from Anssi. + + i tested various upgrades from some chroot with 2008.0, 2007.1, + 2007.0, and it + didn't change the result, so it should be quite safe :) + +2008-05-23 08:24 + + * 3.14 + +2008-05-23 08:23 + + * - add is_package_installed() in URPM/Resolve.pm + (to be used in urpmi 5.20) + +2008-05-20 09:54 + + * 3.13 + +2008-05-19 15:17 + + * - do not ignore dropped provide from updated package + (mdvbz#40842) + +2008-05-15 12:04 + + * enhance error message + +2008-04-14 17:11 + + * un-revert rpm5.org cosmetics now that cooker has reopened + +2008-04-10 08:16 + + * update authors and copyright notic + +2008-03-25 13:15 + + * revert unneeded commit for now + +2008-03-19 04:37 + + * fix a typo in a comment </pedanticlamer> + +2008-03-19 04:34 + + * make URPM more portable by using standard %{_target_vendor} & + %{_target_cpu} macros in stead of Mandriva specific + %{_real_vendor} & (now dead) %{_real_arch} + +2008-03-19 04:18 + + * change x,y check to y,x. More intuitive, for me at least, other + order frequently confuses me ;p + +2008-03-19 03:24 + + * d'oh, argument to hexversion() must of course be passed as + strings + +2008-03-19 03:12 + + * improve rpm version detection + really fix callback size for rpm5.org versions + +2008-03-07 16:50 + + * 3.12 + +2008-03-07 16:49 + + * - do allow to promoting a pkg even if it has unsatisfied require + (since the + code will then fix the unsatisfied require). fixes "big + transaction" + (cf urpmi split-transactions--strict-require.t test_efgh()) + + this code was introduced long ago (*), the code has + changed quite a lot, and it's hard to tell for which reason it + was introduced. + Maybe the check "obsoletes_overlap" replaces it for good? + + (*) in "r11064 | fpons | 2002-06-13", search for "try if + upgrading the package + will be satisfying all the requires" + +2008-03-06 16:59 + + * ouch, add back 'case RPMPROB_DISKNODES:' removed by mistake :/ + +2008-03-06 15:25 + + * revert back to long long since they're of same size anyways and + we avoid warnings that way :) + +2008-03-06 14:24 + + * simplify as pixel suggested + use uint64_t in stead of unsigned long long (which is really the + same, but nicer and more consistent with rpm5:) + +2008-03-03 12:06 + + * minor cosmetics + +2008-03-03 00:50 + + * move compatibility wrapper to rpm5.org upstream + +2008-03-02 23:29 + + * more fixes, makes apt-get build succesfully :D + +2008-03-02 22:22 + + * make all functions inline functions + +2008-03-02 22:02 + + * some more functions for apt-get.. + +2008-03-02 18:18 + + * make C++ compliant + add som function wrappers for apt-get + +2008-03-01 12:33 + + * define WITH_DB in rpm5compat.h in stead of in Makefile + drop useless conditionals for headers as they're already + conditional in themself ;) + +2008-03-01 12:29 + + * do better "detection" of callback size without having to define + it in Makefile (inspired by apt) + +2008-02-29 21:26 + + * try improve on freeing up memory + +2008-02-29 19:06 + + * be sure to return NULL in case of RPMRC_NOTFOUND + +2008-02-29 19:00 + + * provide function name in logging + +2008-02-29 18:45 + + * be sure to always initialize in headerGetEntry + +2008-02-29 15:36 + + * add rpm5.org support to NEWS :) + +2008-02-29 15:33 + + * rpm 4.5 and newer uses unsigned long long ulong1 in stead of + unsigned long ulong1 for rpmProblemGetLong, therefore use %lld in + stead of %ld + +2008-02-29 15:03 + + * add back copyright field manually since svn wouldn't set it.. + +2008-02-29 14:57 + + * try add svn properties to top of file + +2008-02-29 14:42 + + * add svn keywords properties + +2008-02-29 14:40 + + * make inclusion of headers conditional + +2008-02-29 14:29 + + * be sure to set return value to NULL in headerGetEntry when Epoch + isn't set + +2008-02-29 14:24 + + * fix assignment from incompatible pointer type in + Urpm_list_rpm_tag for rpm5 + +2008-02-29 14:14 + + * be sure to use same data type for check_flag + +2008-02-28 17:07 + + * make sure to use same type (signess) in pack_rpm_header + +2008-02-28 16:45 + + * do not define RPM_CALLBACK_LONGLONG for rpm 5.0 + +2008-02-28 16:20 + + * add copyright notice + +2008-02-28 15:30 + + * fix return type and variable of headerRead() + +2008-02-28 13:29 + + * 3.11 + +2008-02-28 13:29 + + * - restore FILENAME_TAG in generated hdlist (to be compatible with + older + distros where ->filename can rely on it) (thanks to Nanar) + +2008-02-28 11:04 + + * fix double _free of msg in headerWrite() & headerRead() + do rpmlog for headerWrite() & headerRead() + drop unused variable in cointainer for headerNextIterator() + +2008-02-28 02:35 + + * drop unused variable + +2008-02-28 02:28 + + * get rid of some warnings + +2008-02-28 02:03 + + * add wrapper function for rpmMachineScore + +2008-02-28 01:38 + + * add wrapper function for headerRead + +2008-02-28 01:24 + + * add wrapper function for headerModifyEntry + +2008-02-28 01:06 + + * fix define of _RPMTAG_INTERNAL at right place and drop redundant + include of rpmtag.h + +2008-02-28 00:56 + + * add rpm5 wrapper functions, work in progress, URPM builds now at + least :o) + +2008-02-27 21:45 + + * fix building with rpm5 DEVEL version + +2008-02-25 23:39 + + * do not mark as deprecated ->filename and + URPM::Build::build_hdlist() + +2008-02-25 23:22 + + * 3.10 + +2008-02-25 21:57 + + * adding filesize to synthesis on @info@ will break backward + compatibility for + no good reason, so switching to a new @filesize@ line + +2008-02-25 21:37 + + * make ->filename work (again) on header + +2008-02-25 21:17 + + * 3.09 + +2008-02-25 21:13 + + * do not do "uniq" on "fullname" since gpg-pubkey-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx + can be installed twice + +2008-02-25 21:05 + + * since ->filename is deprecated, do not use it, esp where not + needed + +2008-02-25 20:43 + + * - add filesize to synthesis, add ->filesize to get it, and add + selected_size_filesize() to compute the sum + +2008-02-25 20:41 + + * fix previous commit (XS comments are perl-style, not C-style) + +2008-02-25 19:17 + + * - do not add FILENAME_TAG and FILESIZE_TAG to hdlist anymore, + deprecate ->filename and ->header_filename, + deprecate URPM::Build build_hdlist and parse_rpms_build_headers + +2008-02-25 16:18 + + * - allow fixing "using one big transaction" that occurs when using + --keep + (#30198) + + nb: since build_transaction_set calls resolve_requested, it must + use the same + options to select the same packages + +2008-02-25 16:16 + + * - allow urpmi to know a package was not selected because a newer + version is + installed (#29838) + +2008-02-25 13:34 + + * - fix sort choices changed in perl-URPM 3.08 + +2008-02-25 13:33 + + * - handle new package providing xxx which conflicts with an + installed package (#17106) + +2008-02-25 09:20 + + * 3.08 + +2008-02-25 09:19 + + * - sort choices on virtual package by provided version (#12645) + 2007-09-12 15:11 Pixel <pixel at mandriva.com> * : better indicate the test case in urpmi |