aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/ChangeLog
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorOlivier Thauvin <nanardon@mandriva.org>2010-07-23 02:47:43 +0000
committerOlivier Thauvin <nanardon@mandriva.org>2010-07-23 02:47:43 +0000
commitfbfd91d92585a88386f6e818325f18faf3443dd3 (patch)
treee8333b13b3eaaaf36ab528f8a26234472cad5d4e /ChangeLog
parent68eaa9772eeb1583fa7b99fd2a03dd7818577af7 (diff)
downloadperl-URPM-fbfd91d92585a88386f6e818325f18faf3443dd3.tar
perl-URPM-fbfd91d92585a88386f6e818325f18faf3443dd3.tar.gz
perl-URPM-fbfd91d92585a88386f6e818325f18faf3443dd3.tar.bz2
perl-URPM-fbfd91d92585a88386f6e818325f18faf3443dd3.tar.xz
perl-URPM-fbfd91d92585a88386f6e818325f18faf3443dd3.zip
- 3.36
Diffstat (limited to 'ChangeLog')
-rw-r--r--ChangeLog1241
1 files changed, 1241 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index cbb52a3..f244eff 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,1244 @@
+2010-07-23 02:43
+
+ * - fix deferencement on hash (instead hashref), warning triggered
+ by perl 5.12
+
+2010-04-23 16:06
+
+ * only print debug message if debug callback is defined
+
+2010-04-23 15:40
+
+ * 3.35
+
+2010-04-23 15:39
+
+ * honour search medias when using --auto-select
+
+2010-03-23 15:48
+
+ * 3.34.1
+
+2010-03-23 15:47
+
+ * check selected packages for unsatisfied requires when a promoted
+ package is backtracked and no replacement is found
+
+ (#57224, Anssi Hannula)
+
+2010-03-23 15:47
+
+ * 3.34
+
+2010-02-24 11:01
+
+ * adjust rpm.org/rpm5.org detection code
+
+ It used to assume that rpm.org had version numbers < 4.7, but
+ it's
+ no longer true with rpm 4.8 being released. Test against 5.0
+ since
+ rpm5.org releases started at 5.0
+
+2010-02-12 15:58
+
+ * check for conflicting selected packages before selecting a
+ package
+
+ check for conflicting selected packages before selecting a
+ package
+ instead of after selecting it, to avoid having to unselect
+ package
+ in case of conflict (which incorrectly unselected packages with
+ unsatisfied dependencies as well, making the following
+ backtrack_selected
+ call behave wrongly as it simply noticed that the package is no
+ longer
+ required)
+
+ Here's the second patch again, now with the function comment
+ updated
+ and added _remove_all_rejected_from() call so that prerejections
+ are
+ still cleared (this was previously called from the
+ removed disable_selected() call). Testsuites pass.
+
+ Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes #57224
+
+2009-10-05 09:48
+
+ * 3.33
+
+2009-10-03 15:18
+
+ * Improve previous fix
+
+2009-10-03 14:56
+
+ * fix lookup of existing pubkeys (#53710)
+
+2009-08-10 14:37
+
+ * update NEWS for 3.32
+
+2009-08-10 14:37
+
+ * 3.32
+
+2009-08-10 14:37
+
+ * comment out unused code
+
+2009-08-10 14:37
+
+ * use set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides for package removal
+
+ Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52667
+
+ k1-1 provides k, but not k1-2
+ l-1 and l-2 requires k
+ m-1 requires k but not m-2
+ n requires m
+
+ User has l-1, m-1, n-1, k1-1.
+
+ There is only one upgrade path:
+ k1-1 -> k1-2
+ m-1 -> m-2
+ removal of l-1
+
+ When transaction is created with all of them (e.g. what
+ --auto-select does
+ first), the path is resolved correctly.
+ However, when the upgrade is triggered with the upgrade of k1,
+ and l is in RPM
+ db before n, resolving proceeds as follows:
+ 1. k1 selected and old version rejected
+ 2. l is promoted
+ 3. m is promoted
+ 4. l-2 is therefore selected
+ 5. no packages are found for k (as k1-1 was rejected in step 1)
+ 6. backtrack_selected calls resolve_rejected to reject the chain
+ 7. rejection process rejects l, m, n
+ 8. m-2 is selected because of step 3
+ End result: n is wrongly removed.
+
+ Therefore, when using --auto-select (with --split-length 1
+ --split-level 1 in
+ this small case, to force splitting) to trigger the upgrade, the
+ early resolve
+ is done correctly, but the first splitted transaction ("rpms
+ sorted by
+ dependencies" has k1 and m separately, so split is tried) tries
+ to remove n and
+ URPM fallbacks to single big transaction.
+
+ In reverse, when using "urpmi k1" to trigger the upgrade, urpmi
+ asks user
+ confirmation for n removal, but the transaction is created with
+ both k1 and m
+ ("rpms sorted by dependencies" has k1+m, so they are put in same
+ transaction),
+ thus triggering the correct behaviour and n is not really removed
+ after all,
+ even if user agreed to it.
+
+ Attached patch fixes this by switching backtrack_selected() to
+ use
+ set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides() for package removal
+ instead of
+ resolve_rejected_(). The code already contained a comment
+ indicating that
+ diff_provides code should be applied.
+ The patch introduces no regression in the urpmi and perl-URPM
+ testsuites.
+
+2009-08-05 20:24
+
+ * Obey options (keep, nodeps) when unselecting current package in
+ the case
+ that was added in 3.31 (Anssi Hannula). In a simple mistake,
+ %options was
+ not passed to backtrack_selected.
+
+2009-08-05 20:17
+
+ * remove extra newline from NEWS
+
+2009-08-05 11:15
+
+ * remove no longer used SPEC_VERIFY constant
+
+2009-08-04 16:47
+
+ * disttag & distepoch isn't utf8…
+
+2009-08-04 16:28
+
+ * cast (es-s) to U32 (as the hv_fetch prototype expects) rather
+ than casting strlen(s) to signed
+
+2009-07-28 16:15
+
+ * 3.31
+
+2009-07-28 16:15
+
+ * we need to link with rpmbuild with rpm 4.6
+
+2009-07-28 13:16
+
+ * update NEWS file
+
+2009-07-28 13:16
+
+ * add a backtrack entry "conflicts" for avoided packages in
+ backtrack_selected
+
+ Patch from Anssi Hannula, fixes part of bug #52153
+
+2009-07-28 13:15
+
+ * do not try to promote to an older package
+
+ Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52460
+
+ When searching for possible promotions, _handle_diff_provides()
+ allows
+ downgrade as well as upgrade.
+
+ However, downgrade is not currently supported, and will fail
+ early in
+ _no_more_recent_installed_and_providing(), called from
+ resolve_requested__no_suggests_().
+
+ As no backtracking is done for early failures in this function
+ (should it be?
+ dunno), the promotion gets forgotten and a failing transaction
+ will occur.
+
+ Simple fix is to only allow upgrade before doing the promotion.
+ Patch attached.
+ It introduces no regressions in urpmi or perl-URPM testsuite.
+
+2009-07-28 13:15
+
+ * unselect current package if an avoided package is already
+ selected
+
+ Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52145
+
+ If package 'a' Conflicts on 'b', and user (or a dependency chain)
+ tries to
+ install both at the same time, perl-URPM will only detect the
+ conflict if
+ package 'a' gets selected first (this depends on hdlist order),
+ as
+ _set_rejected_from is only called in one direction from
+ _handle_conflicts and
+ it does not detect that a package it is about to reject_from is
+ already
+ selected.
+
+ This bug currently causes a failure in urpmi
+ handle-conflict-deps2 testcase.
+
+ This commit checks if avoided package is already selected, and
+ unselects
+ current package in such a case
+
+2009-07-28 13:15
+
+ * move part of _handle_conflicts to _handle_conflicts_with_selected
+
+ Patch by Anssi Hannula, first step toward fixing bug #52145
+
+ If package 'a' Conflicts on 'b', and user (or a dependency chain)
+ tries to
+ install both at the same time, perl-URPM will only detect the
+ conflict if
+ package 'a' gets selected first (this depends on hdlist order),
+ as
+ _set_rejected_from is only called in one direction from
+ _handle_conflicts and
+ it does not detect that a package it is about to reject_from is
+ already
+ selected.
+
+ This patch moves part of _handle_conflicts to
+ _handle_conflicts_with_selected
+ to be called before dependencies get added, needed by next patch
+
+2009-07-28 13:14
+
+ * _handle_conflicts: check all provides for conflicts, not just
+ package name
+
+ Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52135
+
+ If package a has "Conflicts: x" and b has "Provides: x",
+ installing both at the
+ same time creates a failing transaction (instead of producing the
+ "cannot
+ install a (or b), continue?") as perl-URPM does not detect the
+ conflict, as it
+ just checks the conflicts on the package name (it does the
+ correct thing with
+ installed packages, though).
+
+ _handle_conflicts: call _set_rejected_from if any provides match
+ the conflict,
+ instead of just package name
+
+2009-07-28 13:13
+
+ * keep psel/promote info and remove deadlocked pkg instead of
+ aborting upgrade
+
+ Patch from Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #52105
+
+ lib64gcj9 has to be removed (conflicts), therefore so does
+ libgcj9-src (x86_64)
+ that depends on it. Installed java-1.5.0-gcj-src depends on
+ libgcj9-src, so
+ perl-URPM tries to promote the i586 libgcj9-src for it. However,
+ strict_arch
+ check prohibits changing the arch, so it falls back to
+ backtracking.
+ Backtracking finds libgcj9-src again and tries to select it;
+ however, it drops
+ $dep->{psel} and $dep->{promote}, so when it fails again,
+ perl-URPM does not
+ know java-1.5.0-gcj-src should also be removed due to the failed
+ promotion.
+
+ This patch changes the code in backtrack_selected in two ways:
+
+ 1) When a replacement package is found, keep {promote} and {psel}
+ info, so that
+ when backtrack_selected is run the second time it correctly
+ handles the failed
+ promotion.
+ 2) When such a replacement fails as well and the deadlock
+ protection is
+ triggered, do not switch to keep mode for the package that caused
+ the promotion
+ (it would unselect all the packages involved in the update that
+ caused the
+ promotion). Instead proceed to remove it as usual.
+
+ The patch introduces no failures on the urpmi testsuite.
+
+2009-07-28 13:12
+
+ * keep track of sources for obsoleted/removed levels
+
+ Patch by Anssi Hannula, fixes bug #50666
+
+ removed/obsoleted levels are set in set_rejected() when a package
+ is rejected
+ (i.e. removed) or a rejection reason is added. They keep track on
+ whether the
+ package is removed and/or obsoleted.
+
+ When the package has both flags and one of the rejection reasons
+ is removed by
+ _remove_rejected_from(), appropriate flags do not get removed.
+
+ The case I encountered: the package is set for removal when a
+ package it
+ depends on fails upgrade due to unsatisfied dependency and has to
+ be removed
+ (backtrack_selected => resolve_rejected, causing removed=1), and
+ the package is
+ then promoted (causing obsoleted=1). However, the promotion fails
+ due to the
+ same unsatisfied dependency and backtrack_selected =>
+ disable_selected_and_unrequested_dependencies => disable_selected
+ =>
+ _remove_all_rejected_from => _remove_rejected_from gets called.
+ This removes
+ the latter rejection reason, but leaves flags, including the now
+ wrong
+ obsoleted=1. Thus the package is not explicitely removed as an
+ obsoletion is
+ assumed, therefore failing the transaction.
+
+2009-07-27 12:42
+
+ * use pkg-config for rpm 4.x too
+
+2009-07-27 12:41
+
+ * remove unused variable
+
+2009-07-26 16:07
+
+ * rephrase wording, only support for querying %disttag & %distepoch
+ so far, no support
+ for using %distepoch i version comparisions yet...
+
+2009-07-26 16:06
+
+ * add support for %disttag & %distepoch
+
+2009-07-26 08:36
+
+ * just use (void) rather than assign rpmtsFree() since it seems to
+ cause crashy behaviour certain places...
+
+2009-07-26 08:07
+
+ * bumping version was forgotten for 3.30 release, might as well
+ bump it up to
+ 3.31 now for next release…
+
+2009-07-26 08:05
+
+ * update changelog regarding rpm5
+
+2009-07-26 07:08
+
+ * oops, put back line that accidentally got removed in the previous
+ commit…
+
+2009-07-26 06:50
+
+ * enable and fix additional (-Wextra) warnings
+
+2009-07-26 06:38
+
+ * fix gcc warnings about values not being used
+
+2009-07-26 06:23
+
+ * * clean out compatibility code for older rpm versions that's not
+ really
+ supported anymore anyways and move out as much as possible
+ rpm5.org
+ compatibility code out of URPM into new rpm46compat.h @ rpm5.org
+
+2009-07-25 20:50
+
+ * add support for specifying custom filter for compression with
+ build_synthesis()
+
+2009-07-22 18:21
+
+ * really clean up temporary files & directories properly
+
+2009-07-22 18:19
+
+ * prevent distepoch & disttag to be added and appended to package
+ filename
+
+2009-05-11 13:26
+
+ * Removed forgotten debugging logs
+
+2009-05-11 13:22
+
+ * Add bug #
+
+2009-05-11 13:17
+
+ * Release 3.30
+
+2009-05-11 13:17
+
+ * Use key IDs to check if a key is already known or not
+
+ This has the side-effect that if we get a newer public key
+ corresponding
+ to an already known key id, it won't get updated, but for now RPM
+ doesn't let us do that anyway. If a pubkey file contains multiple
+ keys,
+ we no longer handle this case, but I don't think this has been
+ widely
+ tested, if ever...
+
+2009-05-11 13:17
+
+ * Fix comment
+
+2009-05-11 13:17
+
+ * Introduce get_gpg_fingerprint XS function
+
+2009-03-27 14:58
+
+ * 3.29
+
+2009-03-27 14:58
+
+ * Fix regression introduced in fix for bug #47803
+
+ This reverts the previous commit
+
+ only compute diff_provides when the package is newly rejected, in
+ set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides
+
+ Try this incremental patch. It fixes
+ set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides to
+ not compute diff_provides if package was already rejected (and
+ thus the
+ dependencies properly handled already).
+
+2009-03-27 10:28
+
+ * Revert part of the fix for bug #47803 since it breaks upgrades
+ from 2008.1
+
+2009-03-25 13:41
+
+ * 3.28:
+
+2009-03-25 13:22
+
+ * Postpone user choices as much as possible
+
+ Fixes bug #48100, patch from Anssi Hannula
+ Package A requires D and E.
+ Package B provides D and E.
+ Package C provides E.
+
+ If the require on E happens to be resolved first, then perl-URPM
+ will
+ prompt the user, even though installing B is enough.
+
+2009-03-24 16:50
+
+ * Change format of "rpm sorted by dependencies" string
+
+2009-03-24 15:55
+
+ * 3.27
+
+2009-03-23 10:03
+
+ * Don't silently install Suggests:, fixes bug #47934
+
+ When installing a package which suggests an uninstalled package,
+ urpmi
+ currently installs both packages without asking the user while it
+ asks
+ when installing a package which requires an uninstalled package.
+ This is
+ because we call resolve_requested__no_suggests to find which
+ suggested
+ package to install, but this mark the package as requested as
+ well (and
+ we don't ask for confirmation before installing a requested
+ package).
+ This patch calls resolve_requested__no_suggests_ (with a trailing
+ '_')
+ instead which is the same as resolve_requested__no_suggests but
+ does not
+ mark the packages as requested.
+
+2009-03-23 09:40
+
+ * fix _handle_diff_provides in case of impossible-to-satisfy
+ selected packages
+
+ Fixes bug #48223, patch from Anssi Hannula
+
+ Currently, if _handle_diff_provides finds unsatisfied requires on
+ an already
+ selected package, and cannot find any packages from the repo that
+ satisfy
+ these, it calls resolve_rejected_ (or
+ set_rejected_and_compute_diff_provides
+ after fix to bug #47803) (as it does when those unsatisfied
+ requires are on an
+ installed package, which was always the case before r242656).
+ However, those should be called with installed packages only.
+
+ Attached patch makes _handle_diff_provides call
+ disable_selected_and_unrequested_dependencies and
+ _set_rejected_from in case of
+ selected packages.
+
+2009-03-20 18:32
+
+ * check rep for another pkg providing X if the prev pkg gets
+ removed due to a conflict
+
+ Fixes bug #47803, patch from Anssi Hannula
+
+ Closer look at urpmi revealed it only does this if a provide X is
+ removed from
+ an upgraded package, not when a package providing X has to be
+ removed.
+
+ i.e. this works:
+
+ A provides foo
+ B provides foo
+ C requires foo
+
+ Installed A,C.
+
+ A is upgraded and Provides:foo is dropped, B gets installed in
+ order to
+ keep C.
+
+ But this won't:
+
+ A provides foo
+ A requires dep
+ B provides foo
+ C requires foo
+ D provides dep
+
+ Installed A,C,D.
+
+ D is upgraded and Provides:dep is dropped, A gets removed, C gets
+ removed.
+
+2009-03-05 11:14
+
+ * 3.26
+
+2009-03-05 11:13
+
+ * (verify_signature) make checking urpmi signatures works in
+ chrooted environments
+ (especially important for installer where there's no rpmdb in /
+ (really
+ /var/lib/rpm) and thus no keys to check against)
+
+2009-01-16 14:48
+
+ * Release 3.25
+
+2009-01-16 14:48
+
+ * Really fix bug #46874
+
+2009-01-13 14:27
+
+ * Version 3.24 - 13 January 2009, by Christophe Fergeau
+
+ - fix sorting choices on provided version (feature introduced in
+ 3.08,
+ but was not working if packages were coming from different
+ repository)
+ - when a "Requires:" can be fullfilled by several different
+ packages and
+ one of those packages is explicitly required by another package
+ which
+ is also being installed, silently choose this package instead of
+ letting
+ the choice up to perl-URPM user (fixes bug #46874)
+
+2009-01-12 08:04
+
+ * add comments
+
+2009-01-12 08:03
+
+ * - drop parse_rpms (unused, parse_rpms_build_headers or parse_rpm
+ are used instead)
+ - add a comment
+
+2009-01-12 07:59
+
+ * add a comment
+
+2009-01-12 07:56
+
+ * - drop function fuzzy_parse() (it is unused)
+ - add some comment
+
+2009-01-09 14:40
+
+ * add a comment
+
+2009-01-09 14:39
+
+ * add some comment
+
+2009-01-09 14:24
+
+ * - @unsatisfied is a better var name than @l
+ - add some comment
+
+2009-01-08 13:46
+
+ * make it clear the func is local
+
+2009-01-08 13:45
+
+ * add a comment
+
+2009-01-08 09:24
+
+ * Favour required packages when we have several choices to fulfill
+ a "requires", fixes bug #46874
+
+2009-01-06 15:55
+
+ * - add some comment
+ - enhance a comment
+
+2009-01-06 14:05
+
+ * document a "hack"
+
+2008-12-15 17:02
+
+ * - fix sorting choices on provided version (feature introduced in
+ 3.08,
+ but was not working if packages were coming from different
+ repository)
+
+2008-12-15 11:08
+
+ * 3.23
+
+2008-12-15 11:05
+
+ * - fix bad free() (thanks to glibc for detecting it)
+
+2008-12-12 11:04
+
+ * 3.22
+
+2008-12-12 09:19
+
+ * - fix scriptlet failing:
+ adapt to librpm4.6, rpmtsSetRootDir(ts, "") is forbidden
+
+2008-12-09 16:40
+
+ * revert wrong commit
+
+2008-12-09 16:33
+
+ * correctly clean temp directories
+
+2008-12-09 16:05
+
+ * 3.21
+
+2008-12-09 16:04
+
+ * - adapt to librpm4.6
+
+2008-12-09 16:03
+
+ * - adapt to rpm 4.6 changes:
+ - headerNextIterator -> headerNext
+ - headerAddEntry -> headerPut
+ - headerModifyEntry -> headerMod
+
+2008-12-09 16:02
+
+ * - adapt to rpm 4.6 changes: headerGetEntry -> headerGet
+
+2008-12-09 16:00
+
+ * - adapt to some easy rpm 4.6 changes:
+ - headerSprintf -> headerFormat
+ - headerAddEntry -> headerPutString
+ - headerRemoveEntry -> headerDel
+ - rpmProblemGetLong -> rpmProblemGetDiskNeed
+
+2008-12-09 15:55
+
+ * free the iterator *after* use
+ (otherwise it segfaults with 4.6.0-rc1, and i wonder how it
+ worked before...)
+
+2008-12-09 15:52
+
+ * do free the ts after user, this is especially needed since
+ rpmVerifySignature
+ (wrongly) called in rpmReadPackageFile can open the rpmdb which
+ won't get
+ closed if ts is not closed
+
+2008-12-09 15:50
+
+ * - don't handle %_sourcedir specially, it's not needed
+ - use an absolute filename for %_topdir, it seems to help
+ (bug in rpm 4.6.0-rc1?)
+
+2008-12-09 15:49
+
+ * - list_rpm_tag() is no more
+ - remove a failing test (old)
+
+2008-12-09 15:47
+
+ * - drop list_rpm_tag()
+
+2008-12-09 15:45
+
+ * adapt types to rpm-4.6.x
+
+2008-12-08 17:35
+
+ * fix rpmRelocation usage with rpm 5.2
+
+2008-10-14 17:35
+
+ * 3.20
+
+2008-10-14 17:35
+
+ * - $trans->run can now return both the translated errors, and some
+ parsable
+ errors (useful for example to detect diskspace issues)
+
+2008-10-14 08:51
+
+ * use rpmuint64_t rather than long long, we know that it should
+ stay compatible:)
+
+2008-10-10 09:14
+
+ * fix build with rpm5.org HEAD
+
+2008-10-07 10:47
+
+ * 3.19
+
+2008-10-07 10:46
+
+ * - handle flag "replacefiles"
+
+2008-07-18 18:09
+
+ * add filelinktos() & dirnames() to URPM::Package
+
+2008-07-17 20:03
+
+ * ensure that initSourceHeader gets run for rpm5.org, otherwise
+ querying of spec files won't work
+
+2008-07-14 16:49
+
+ * fix build with rpm5.org HEAD
+
+2008-07-07 21:53
+
+ * 3.18
+
+2008-07-07 14:08
+
+ * - revert change introduced in 3.16 (it breaks too much, eg
+ superuser--priority-upgrade.t test case), and introduce
+ $state->{rejected_already_installed} instead
+
+2008-07-07 13:23
+
+ * fix typo in description
+
+2008-07-04 13:06
+
+ * 3.17
+
+2008-07-04 13:05
+
+ * add removed_or_obsoleted_packages()
+
+2008-07-04 13:04
+
+ * - handle $state->{orphans_to_remove} in selected_size() and
+ build_transaction_set()
+
+2008-07-04 11:25
+
+ * - add traverse_tag_find()
+
+2008-07-03 11:25
+
+ * perl_checker compliance
+
+2008-07-03 11:23
+
+ * remove unused vars
+
+2008-07-03 11:22
+
+ * create packages_to_remove() and use it to factorize code
+
+2008-07-01 15:26
+
+ * create rpmtag_from_string() out of Db_traverse_tag
+
+2008-06-26 12:47
+
+ * 3.16
+
+2008-06-26 09:46
+
+ * - when not selecting a package because already installed,
+ but it in $state->{rejected} with flags {installed}
+
+2008-06-24 09:06
+
+ * adapt tests to ->compare change
+
+2008-06-23 08:42
+
+ * 3.15
+
+2008-06-17 09:39
+
+ * add Anssi name in the log
+
+2008-06-17 09:38
+
+ * - fix urpmi wrongly considering epochless conflicts to match any
+ epoch in a
+ case when urpmi should upgrade a conflicting package to an
+ actually
+ non-conflicting version (cf epochless-conflict-with-promotion
+ urpmi test)
+
+ from Anssi.
+
+ i tested various upgrades from some chroot with 2008.0, 2007.1,
+ 2007.0, and it
+ didn't change the result, so it should be quite safe :)
+
+2008-05-23 08:24
+
+ * 3.14
+
+2008-05-23 08:23
+
+ * - add is_package_installed() in URPM/Resolve.pm
+ (to be used in urpmi 5.20)
+
+2008-05-20 09:54
+
+ * 3.13
+
+2008-05-19 15:17
+
+ * - do not ignore dropped provide from updated package
+ (mdvbz#40842)
+
+2008-05-15 12:04
+
+ * enhance error message
+
+2008-04-14 17:11
+
+ * un-revert rpm5.org cosmetics now that cooker has reopened
+
+2008-04-10 08:16
+
+ * update authors and copyright notic
+
+2008-03-25 13:15
+
+ * revert unneeded commit for now
+
+2008-03-19 04:37
+
+ * fix a typo in a comment </pedanticlamer>
+
+2008-03-19 04:34
+
+ * make URPM more portable by using standard %{_target_vendor} &
+ %{_target_cpu} macros in stead of Mandriva specific
+ %{_real_vendor} & (now dead) %{_real_arch}
+
+2008-03-19 04:18
+
+ * change x,y check to y,x. More intuitive, for me at least, other
+ order frequently confuses me ;p
+
+2008-03-19 03:24
+
+ * d'oh, argument to hexversion() must of course be passed as
+ strings
+
+2008-03-19 03:12
+
+ * improve rpm version detection
+ really fix callback size for rpm5.org versions
+
+2008-03-07 16:50
+
+ * 3.12
+
+2008-03-07 16:49
+
+ * - do allow to promoting a pkg even if it has unsatisfied require
+ (since the
+ code will then fix the unsatisfied require). fixes "big
+ transaction"
+ (cf urpmi split-transactions--strict-require.t test_efgh())
+
+ this code was introduced long ago (*), the code has
+ changed quite a lot, and it's hard to tell for which reason it
+ was introduced.
+ Maybe the check "obsoletes_overlap" replaces it for good?
+
+ (*) in "r11064 | fpons | 2002-06-13", search for "try if
+ upgrading the package
+ will be satisfying all the requires"
+
+2008-03-06 16:59
+
+ * ouch, add back 'case RPMPROB_DISKNODES:' removed by mistake :/
+
+2008-03-06 15:25
+
+ * revert back to long long since they're of same size anyways and
+ we avoid warnings that way :)
+
+2008-03-06 14:24
+
+ * simplify as pixel suggested
+ use uint64_t in stead of unsigned long long (which is really the
+ same, but nicer and more consistent with rpm5:)
+
+2008-03-03 12:06
+
+ * minor cosmetics
+
+2008-03-03 00:50
+
+ * move compatibility wrapper to rpm5.org upstream
+
+2008-03-02 23:29
+
+ * more fixes, makes apt-get build succesfully :D
+
+2008-03-02 22:22
+
+ * make all functions inline functions
+
+2008-03-02 22:02
+
+ * some more functions for apt-get..
+
+2008-03-02 18:18
+
+ * make C++ compliant
+ add som function wrappers for apt-get
+
+2008-03-01 12:33
+
+ * define WITH_DB in rpm5compat.h in stead of in Makefile
+ drop useless conditionals for headers as they're already
+ conditional in themself ;)
+
+2008-03-01 12:29
+
+ * do better "detection" of callback size without having to define
+ it in Makefile (inspired by apt)
+
+2008-02-29 21:26
+
+ * try improve on freeing up memory
+
+2008-02-29 19:06
+
+ * be sure to return NULL in case of RPMRC_NOTFOUND
+
+2008-02-29 19:00
+
+ * provide function name in logging
+
+2008-02-29 18:45
+
+ * be sure to always initialize in headerGetEntry
+
+2008-02-29 15:36
+
+ * add rpm5.org support to NEWS :)
+
+2008-02-29 15:33
+
+ * rpm 4.5 and newer uses unsigned long long ulong1 in stead of
+ unsigned long ulong1 for rpmProblemGetLong, therefore use %lld in
+ stead of %ld
+
+2008-02-29 15:03
+
+ * add back copyright field manually since svn wouldn't set it..
+
+2008-02-29 14:57
+
+ * try add svn properties to top of file
+
+2008-02-29 14:42
+
+ * add svn keywords properties
+
+2008-02-29 14:40
+
+ * make inclusion of headers conditional
+
+2008-02-29 14:29
+
+ * be sure to set return value to NULL in headerGetEntry when Epoch
+ isn't set
+
+2008-02-29 14:24
+
+ * fix assignment from incompatible pointer type in
+ Urpm_list_rpm_tag for rpm5
+
+2008-02-29 14:14
+
+ * be sure to use same data type for check_flag
+
+2008-02-28 17:07
+
+ * make sure to use same type (signess) in pack_rpm_header
+
+2008-02-28 16:45
+
+ * do not define RPM_CALLBACK_LONGLONG for rpm 5.0
+
+2008-02-28 16:20
+
+ * add copyright notice
+
+2008-02-28 15:30
+
+ * fix return type and variable of headerRead()
+
+2008-02-28 13:29
+
+ * 3.11
+
+2008-02-28 13:29
+
+ * - restore FILENAME_TAG in generated hdlist (to be compatible with
+ older
+ distros where ->filename can rely on it) (thanks to Nanar)
+
+2008-02-28 11:04
+
+ * fix double _free of msg in headerWrite() & headerRead()
+ do rpmlog for headerWrite() & headerRead()
+ drop unused variable in cointainer for headerNextIterator()
+
+2008-02-28 02:35
+
+ * drop unused variable
+
+2008-02-28 02:28
+
+ * get rid of some warnings
+
+2008-02-28 02:03
+
+ * add wrapper function for rpmMachineScore
+
+2008-02-28 01:38
+
+ * add wrapper function for headerRead
+
+2008-02-28 01:24
+
+ * add wrapper function for headerModifyEntry
+
+2008-02-28 01:06
+
+ * fix define of _RPMTAG_INTERNAL at right place and drop redundant
+ include of rpmtag.h
+
+2008-02-28 00:56
+
+ * add rpm5 wrapper functions, work in progress, URPM builds now at
+ least :o)
+
+2008-02-27 21:45
+
+ * fix building with rpm5 DEVEL version
+
+2008-02-25 23:39
+
+ * do not mark as deprecated ->filename and
+ URPM::Build::build_hdlist()
+
+2008-02-25 23:22
+
+ * 3.10
+
+2008-02-25 21:57
+
+ * adding filesize to synthesis on @info@ will break backward
+ compatibility for
+ no good reason, so switching to a new @filesize@ line
+
+2008-02-25 21:37
+
+ * make ->filename work (again) on header
+
+2008-02-25 21:17
+
+ * 3.09
+
+2008-02-25 21:13
+
+ * do not do "uniq" on "fullname" since gpg-pubkey-xxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxx
+ can be installed twice
+
+2008-02-25 21:05
+
+ * since ->filename is deprecated, do not use it, esp where not
+ needed
+
+2008-02-25 20:43
+
+ * - add filesize to synthesis, add ->filesize to get it, and add
+ selected_size_filesize() to compute the sum
+
+2008-02-25 20:41
+
+ * fix previous commit (XS comments are perl-style, not C-style)
+
+2008-02-25 19:17
+
+ * - do not add FILENAME_TAG and FILESIZE_TAG to hdlist anymore,
+ deprecate ->filename and ->header_filename,
+ deprecate URPM::Build build_hdlist and parse_rpms_build_headers
+
+2008-02-25 16:18
+
+ * - allow fixing "using one big transaction" that occurs when using
+ --keep
+ (#30198)
+
+ nb: since build_transaction_set calls resolve_requested, it must
+ use the same
+ options to select the same packages
+
+2008-02-25 16:16
+
+ * - allow urpmi to know a package was not selected because a newer
+ version is
+ installed (#29838)
+
+2008-02-25 13:34
+
+ * - fix sort choices changed in perl-URPM 3.08
+
+2008-02-25 13:33
+
+ * - handle new package providing xxx which conflicts with an
+ installed package (#17106)
+
+2008-02-25 09:20
+
+ * 3.08
+
+2008-02-25 09:19
+
+ * - sort choices on virtual package by provided version (#12645)
+
2007-09-12 15:11 Pixel <pixel at mandriva.com>
* : better indicate the test case in urpmi